首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>JDR Clinical and Translational Research >Judgment of the Quality of Restorative Care as Predictors of Restoration Retreatment: Findings from the National Dental PBRN
【2h】

Judgment of the Quality of Restorative Care as Predictors of Restoration Retreatment: Findings from the National Dental PBRN

机译:作为恢复再治疗的预测指标的恢复护理质量的判断:来自国家牙科PBRN的发现

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The primary aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that a patient’s subjective assessments of the dentist’s technical competence, quality of care, and anticipated restoration longevity during a restorative visit are predictive of restoration outcome. This prospective cohort study involved 3,326 patients who received treatment for a defective restoration in a permanent tooth, participated in a baseline patient satisfaction survey, and returned for follow-up. Of the 4,400 restorations that were examined by 150 dentists, 266 (6%) received additional treatment after baseline. Reporting satisfaction with the technical skill of the dentist or quality of the dental work at baseline was not associated with retreatment after baseline. However, patients’ views at baseline that the fee was reasonable (odds ratio [OR], 1.6) was associated with retreatment after baseline, whereas satisfaction at baseline with how long the filling would last (OR, 0.6) was associated with less retreatment. These findings suggest that retreatment occurs more often for patients who at baseline are satisfied with the cost or who at baseline have less confidence in the restoration. The authors found no associations between restoration retreatment and the patients’ baseline evaluations of the technical skills of their dentists or perceptions of quality care.>Knowledge Transfer Statement: Dental patients’ ratings of their dentist’s skills were not related to a restoration needing retreatment. Patients focus on other aspects of the dental visit when making this judgment.
机译:这项研究的主要目的是检验以下假设,即患者对牙科医生的技术能力,护理质量和在恢复性就诊期间预期的恢复寿命的主观评估可以预测恢复的结果。这项前瞻性队列研究涉及3326名患者,他们接受了恒牙修复不良的治疗,参加了基线患者满意度调查,然后返回进行随访。在150位牙医检查的4,400个修复体中,有266个(6%)在基线后接受了额外的治疗。在基线后报告对牙医的技术技能或牙科工作质量感到满意与基线后的再治疗无关。但是,患者在基线时认为收费合理(比值[OR]为1.6)与基线后的再治疗有关,而基线对填充持续时间的满意程度(OR为0.6)与较少的再治疗有关。这些发现表明,对于基线时对费用满意的患者或基线时对恢复的信心较小的患者,再治疗的发生频率更高。作者发现修复再治疗与患者对牙医技术技能的基线评估或对优质护理的看法之间没有关联。>知识转移声明:牙科患者对牙医技能的评价与需要修复的修复体。做出此判断时,患者会专注于牙科就诊的其他方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号