首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Laparoendoscopic Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A >Evaluation of a Powered Stapler System with Gripping Surface Technology on Surgical Interventions Required During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
【2h】

Evaluation of a Powered Stapler System with Gripping Surface Technology on Surgical Interventions Required During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

机译:带有表面抓握技术的动力吻合器系统对腹腔镜袖胃切除术所需手术干预的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Transection of gastric tissue during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) can be challenging. Reinforcing the staple line may decrease the incidence of issues requiring intervention.>Methods: The objective of this study was to compare the number of intraoperative surgical interventions for a surgical stapler and reload system with Gripping Surface Technology (GST) to standard reloads in patients who underwent LSG. Patients who underwent elective LSG were enrolled. The study was conducted in two stages. For Stage 1, procedures were performed using a powered stapler and standard reloads. For Stage 2, a reload system with GST was used. The primary endpoint was surgical interventions for bleeding and/or staple line issues during transection of the greater curvature of the stomach. Propensity score matching was applied to create two groups similar in baseline characteristics and risk factors.>Results: A total of 111 subjects were enrolled across four centers. Propensity-matched procedures were completed with the standard (n = 38) or GST reloads (n = 38). The mean number of interventions in the standard group was 1.9 (1.29) versus 1.1 (1.45) in the GST group. Nonparametric comparisons were statistically significant, indicating a reduction in the distribution of interventions for GST subjects (P = .0036 for matched pair data). Tissue slippage during transection was low for both groups. Intraoperative leak testing was negative in all procedures, and no procedures were converted to open.>Conclusions: Use of the GST stapling system reduces the need for staple line interventions in LSG. Both stapling systems had an acceptable safety profile.
机译:>背景:腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)期间胃组织的切除可能具有挑战性。加强钉书钉线可以减少需要干预的问题的发生率。>方法:本研究的目的是比较采用Gripping Surface Technology(GST)的手术吻合器和重载系统的术中手术干预次数。接受LSG的患者标准加药量。接受择期LSG的患者入组。该研究分两个阶段进行。对于第1阶段,使用动力订书机和标准装填器执行操作。对于第2阶段,使用了带有GST的重载系统。主要终点是手术切除较大曲率的胃时出血和/或吻合钉问题。应用倾向得分匹配来创建基线特征和危险因素相似的两组。>结果:四个中心共招募了111名受试者。通过标准(n = 38)或GST重装(n = 38)完成了与倾向匹配的过程。标准组的平均干预数为1.9(1.29),而商品及服务税组的平均干预数为1.1(1.45)。非参数比较具有统计学意义,表明GST受试者的干预分布减少(对于配对数据,P = .0036)。两组在横切过程中的组织滑移率均较低。术中所有程序的渗漏测试均为阴性,并且没有将任何程序转换为开放程序。>结论:使用GST钉书钉系统减少了LSG钉书机干预的需要。两种装订系统均具有可接受的安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号