首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Nutrition >Validation of Cross-Sectional Time Series and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines Models for the Prediction of Energy Expenditure in Children and Adolescents Using Doubly Labeled Water
【2h】

Validation of Cross-Sectional Time Series and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines Models for the Prediction of Energy Expenditure in Children and Adolescents Using Doubly Labeled Water

机译:截面时间序列和多元自适应回归样条模型用于使用双标记水预测儿童和青少年能源支出的验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Accurate, nonintrusive, and inexpensive techniques are needed to measure energy expenditure (EE) in free-living populations. Our primary aim in this study was to validate cross-sectional time series (CSTS) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) models based on observable participant characteristics, heart rate (HR), and accelerometer counts (AC) for prediction of minute-by-minute EE, and hence 24-h total EE (TEE), against a 7-d doubly labeled water (DLW) method in children and adolescents. Our secondary aim was to demonstrate the utility of CSTS and MARS to predict awake EE, sleep EE, and activity EE (AEE) from 7-d HR and AC records, because these shorter periods are not verifiable by DLW, which provides an estimate of the individual's mean TEE over a 7-d interval. CSTS and MARS models were validated in 60 normal-weight and overweight participants (ages 5–18 y). The Actiheart monitor was used to simultaneously measure HR and AC. For prediction of TEE, mean absolute errors were 10.7 ± 307 kcal/d and 18.7 ± 252 kcal/d for CSTS and MARS models, respectively, relative to DLW. Corresponding root mean square error values were 305 and 251 kcal/d for CSTS and MARS models, respectively. Bland-Altman plots indicated that the predicted values were in good agreement with the DLW-derived TEE values. Validation of CSTS and MARS models based on participant characteristics, HR monitoring, and accelerometry for the prediction of minute-by-minute EE, and hence 24-h TEE, against the DLW method indicated no systematic bias and acceptable limits of agreement for pediatric groups and individuals under free-living conditions.
机译:需要精确,非侵入性和廉价的技术来测量自由生活人口的能源支出(EE)。本研究的主要目的是基于可观察的参与者特征,心率(HR)和加速度计计数(AC)来验证横断面时间序列(CSTS)和多元自适应回归样条(MARS)模型,以预测分钟分钟的EE,因此是24小时的总EE(TEE),与儿童和青少年的7天双标记水(DLW)方法相比。我们的次要目的是证明CSTS和MARS从7天HR和AC记录中预测清醒EE,睡眠EE和活动EE(AEE)的实用性,因为DLW无法验证这些较短的时间,从而可以估算个人在7天间隔内的平均TEE。在60名体重正常和超重的参与者(5至18岁)中验证了CSTS和MARS模型。 Actiheart监视器用于同时测量HR和AC。对于TEE的预测,相对于DLW,CSTS和MARS模型的平均绝对误差分别为10.7±307 kcal / d和18.7±252 kcal / d。对于CSTS和MARS模型,相应的均方根误差值分别为305和251 kcal / d。 Bland-Altman图表明,预测值与DLW得出的TEE值非常吻合。根据参与者特征,HR监测和加速度计对CSTS和MARS模型进行验证,以针对DLW方法预测每分钟的EE,从而预测24小时的TEE,表明对于小儿组没有系统性偏差和可接受的协议限制和有自由生活条件的个人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号