首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Nutrition: Official Organ of the American Institute of Nutrition >Cross-Sectional Time Series and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines Models Using Accelerometry and Heart Rate Predict Energy Expenditure of Preschoolers
【24h】

Cross-Sectional Time Series and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines Models Using Accelerometry and Heart Rate Predict Energy Expenditure of Preschoolers

机译:使用加速度计和心率的跨部门时间序列和多元自适应回归样条曲线模型预测学龄前儿童的能量支出

获取原文
           

摘要

Prediction equations of energy expenditure (EE) using accelerometers and miniaturized heart rate (HR) monitors have been developed in older children and adults but not in preschool-aged children. Because the relationships between accelerometer counts (ACs), HR, and EE are confounded by growth and maturation, age-specific EE prediction equations are required. We used advanced technology (fast-response room calorimetry, Actiheart and Actigraph accelerometers, and miniaturized HR monitors) and sophisticated mathematical modeling [cross-sectional time series (CSTS) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS)] to develop models for the prediction of minute-by-minute EE in 69 preschool-aged children. CSTS and MARS models were developed by using participant characteristics (gender, age, weight, height), Actiheart (HR+AC_x) or ActiGraph parameters (AC_x, AC_y, AC_z, steps, posture) [x, y, and z represent the directional axes of the accelerometers], and their significant 1- and 2-min lag and lead values, and significant interactions. Relative to EE measured by calorimetry, mean percentage errors predicting awake EE (?1.1 ± 8.7%, 0.3 ± 6.9%, and ?0.2 ± 6.9%) with CSTS models were slightly higher than with MARS models (?0.7 ± 6.0%, 0.3 ± 4.8%, and ?0.6 ± 4.6%) for Actiheart, ActiGraph, and ActiGraph+HR devices, respectively. Predicted awake EE values were within ±10% for 81–87% of individuals for CSTS models and for 91–98% of individuals for MARS models. Concordance correlation coefficients were 0.936, 0.931, and 0.943 for CSTS EE models and 0.946, 0.948, and 0.940 for MARS EE models for Actiheart, ActiGraph, and ActiGraph+HR devices, respectively. CSTS and MARS models should prove useful in capturing the complex dynamics of EE and movement that are characteristic of preschool-aged children.
机译:使用加速度计和微型心率(HR)监测器的能量消耗(EE)预测方程式已针对年龄较大的儿童和成人开发,但未针对学龄前儿童开发。由于加速度计计数(ACs),HR和EE之间的关系因生长和成熟而混淆,因此需要特定于年龄的EE预测方程式。我们使用先进的技术(快速响应房间量热法,Actiheart和Actigraph加速度计以及小型化的HR监视器)和复杂的数学模型[横截面时间序列(CSTS)和多元自适应回归样条(MARS)]来开发模型来预测69名学龄前儿童的每分钟EE。 CSTS和MARS模型是通过使用参与者特征(性别,年龄,体重,身高),Actiheart(HR + AC_x)或ActiGraph参数(AC_x,AC_y,AC_z,台阶,姿势)[x,y和z表示方向的加速度计的轴],其1分钟和2分钟的滞后和超前值以及显着的相互作用。相对于通过量热法测得的EE,CSTS模型预测清醒EE的平均百分比误差(?1.1±8.7%,0.3±6.9%和?0.2±6.9​​%)略高于MARS模型(?0.7±6.0%,0.3)对于Actiheart,ActiGraph和ActiGraph + HR设备,分别为±4.8%和±0.6±4.6%)。 CSTS模型的预期清醒EE值在81–87%的个体中,而MARS模型的91–98%的个体的预期清醒EE值在±10%以内。对于Actiheart,ActiGraph和ActiGraph + HR设备,CSTS EE模型的一致性相关系数分别为0.936、0.931和0.943,而MARS EE模型的一致性相关系数分别为0.946、0.948和0.940。 CSTS和MARS模型应被证明对于捕获学龄前儿童所特有的EE和运动的复杂动力很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号