首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Physiology >Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output by brachial occlusion-cuff technique: comparison with the open-circuit acetylene washin method
【2h】

Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output by brachial occlusion-cuff technique: comparison with the open-circuit acetylene washin method

机译:肱动脉袖套技术无创评估心输出量:与开路乙炔洗涤法比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cardiac output (CO) assessment as a basic hemodynamic parameter has been of interest in exercise physiology, cardiology, and anesthesiology. Noninvasive techniques available are technically challenging, and thus difficult to use outside of a clinical or laboratory setting. We propose a novel method of noninvasive CO assessment using a single, upper-arm cuff. The method uses the arterial pressure pulse wave signal acquired from the brachial artery during 20-s intervals of suprasystolic occlusion. This method was evaluated in a cohort of 12 healthy individuals (age, 27.7 ± 5.4 yr, 50% men) and compared with an established method for noninvasive CO assessment, the open-circuit acetylene method (OpCirc) at rest, and during low- to moderate-intensity exercise. CO increased from rest to exercise (rest, 7.4 ± 0.8 vs. 7.2 ± 0.8; low, 9.8 ± 1.8 vs. 9.9 ± 2.0; moderate, 14.1 ± 2.8 vs. 14.8 ± 3.2 l/min) as assessed by the cuff-occlusion and OpCirc techniques, respectively. The average error of experimental technique compared with OpCirc was −0.25 ± 1.02 l/min, Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.96 (rest + exercise), and 0.21 ± 0.42 l/min with Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.87 (rest only). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement between methods (within 95% boundaries); the reproducibility coefficient (RPC) = 0.84 l/min with R2 = 0.75 at rest and RPC = 2 l/min with R2 = 0.92 at rest and during exercise, respectively. In comparison with an established method to quantify CO, the cuff-occlusion method provides similar measures at rest and with light to moderate exercise. Thus, we believe this method has the potential to be used as a new, noninvasive method for assessing CO during exercise.
机译:作为基本的血液动力学参数的心输出量(CO)评估在运动生理学,心脏病学和麻醉学中引起了人们的兴趣。可用的非侵入性技术在技术上具有挑战性,因此很难在临床或实验室环境之外使用。我们提出了一种使用单个上臂袖带进行无创CO评估的新方法。该方法使用在收缩期上闭塞的20秒间隔内从肱动脉获取的动脉压力脉搏波信号。在12名健康个体(年龄为27.7±5.4岁,男性为50%)的队列中对该方法进行了评估,并将其与已建立的无创CO评估方法,静止乙炔开路乙炔法(OpCirc)和低氧时进行比较。到中等强度的运动。通过袖带阻塞评估,从休息到运动的CO值增加(休息时为7.4±0.8对7.2±0.8;低时为9.8±1.8对9.9±2.0;中度为14.1±2.8对14.8±3.2 l / min)和OpCirc技术。与OpCirc相比,实验技术的平均误差为-0.25±1.02 l / min,Pearson的相关系数为0.96(休息+运动),而0.21±0.42 l / min的情况为Pearson相关系数为0.87(仅休息)。 Bland-Altman分析表明方法之间具有很好的一致性(在95%范围内);在静止和运动时,R 2 = 0.75时的再现性系数(RPC)= 0.84 l / min,在静止和运动中R 2 = 0.92时的RPC = 2 l / min,分别。与已建立的量化CO的方法相比,袖带阻塞法在休息时以及轻度至中度运动时可提供类似的测量。因此,我们认为这种方法有可能被用作评估运动过程中一氧化碳的一种新的,非侵入性的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号