首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Epidemiology >Socioeconomic differences in alcohol-attributable mortality compared with all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Socioeconomic differences in alcohol-attributable mortality compared with all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:酒精引起的死亡率与全因死亡率相比的社会经济差异:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Factors underlying socioeconomic inequalities in mortality are not well understood. This study contributes to our understanding of potential pathways to result in socioeconomic inequalities, by examining alcohol consumption as one potential explanation via comparing socioeconomic inequalities in alcohol-attributable mortality and all-cause mortality.>Methods: Web of Science, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and ETOH were searched systematically from their inception to second week of February 2013 for articles reporting alcohol-attributable mortality by socioeconomic status, operationalized by using information on education, occupation, employment status or income. The sex-specific ratios of relative risks (RRRs) of alcohol-attributable mortality to all-cause mortality were pooled for different operationalizations of socioeconomic status using inverse-variance weighted random effects models. These RRRs were then combined to a single estimate.>Results: We identified 15 unique papers suitable for a meta-analysis; capturing about 133 million people, 3 741 334 deaths from all causes and 167 652 alcohol-attributable deaths. The overall RRRs amounted to RRR = 1.78 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43 to 2.22) and RRR = 1.66 (95% CI 1.20 to 2.31), for women and men, respectively. In other words: lower socioeconomic status leads to 1.5–2-fold higher mortality for alcohol-attributable causes compared with all causes.>Conclusions: Alcohol was identified as a factor underlying higher mortality risks in more disadvantaged populations. All alcohol-attributable mortality is in principle avoidable, and future alcohol policies must take into consideration any differential effect on socioeconomic groups.
机译:>背景:关于死亡率的社会经济不平等的潜在因素尚未完全了解。这项研究通过比较酒精引起的死亡率和全因死亡率的社会经济不平等现象,研究了饮酒作为一种可能的解释,从而有助于我们理解导致社会经济不平等的潜在途径。>方法: Web of Science ,MEDLINE,PsycINFO和ETOH从成立到2013年2月第二周进行了系统搜索,以按社会经济状况报告酒精引起的死亡率的文章,并使用有关教育,职业,就业状况或收入的信息进行了操作。使用逆方差加权随机效应模型,针对不同的社会经济地位操作,汇总了酒精引起的死亡率与全因死亡率的相对性别比(RRR)。然后将这些存款准备金率合并为一个估计值。>结果:我们确定了15篇适合进行荟萃分析的独特论文;捕获了约1.33亿人,各种原因造成3 741 334人死亡,而酒精引起的死亡167 652人。对于女性和男性,总的存款准备金率分别为:存款准备金= 1.78(95%置信区间(CI)为1.43至2.22)和存款准备金= 1.66(95%CI为1.20至2.31)。换句话说:与所有原因相比,较低的社会经济地位导致因酒精引起的原因导致的死亡率高1.5到2倍。>结论:在较弱势人群中,酒精被认为是造成较高死亡率风险的因素。从原则上讲,所有酒精引起的死亡率都是可以避免的,未来的酒精政策必须考虑对社会经济群体的任何不同影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号