首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Epidemiology >An assessment of Lot Quality Assurance Sampling to evaluate malaria outcome indicators: extending malaria indicator surveys
【2h】

An assessment of Lot Quality Assurance Sampling to evaluate malaria outcome indicators: extending malaria indicator surveys

机译:评估批次质量保证抽样以评估疟疾结果指标:扩展疟疾指标调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background Large investments and increased global prioritization of malaria prevention and treatment have resulted in greater emphasis on programme monitoring and evaluation (M&E) in many countries. Many countries currently use large multistage cluster sample surveys to monitor malaria outcome indicators on a regional and national level. However, these surveys often mask local-level variability important to programme management. Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) has played a valuable role for local-level programme M&E. If incorporated into these larger surveys, it would provide a comprehensive M&E plan at little, if any, extra cost.>Methods The Mozambique Ministry of Health conducted a Malaria Indicator Survey (MIS) in June and July 2007. We applied LQAS classification rules to the 345 sampled enumeration areas to demonstrate identifying high- and low-performing areas with respect to two malaria program indicators—‘household possession of any bednet’ and ‘household possession of any insecticide-treated bednet (ITN)’.>Results As shown by the MIS, no province in Mozambique achieved the 70% coverage target for household possession of bednets or ITNs. By applying LQAS classification rules to the data, we identify 266 of the 345 enumeration areas as having bednet coverage severely below the 70% target. An additional 73 were identified with low ITN coverage.>Conclusions This article demonstrates the feasibility of integrating LQAS into multistage cluster sampling surveys and using these results to support a comprehensive national, regional and local programme M&E system. Furthermore, in the recommendations we outlined how to integrate the Large Country-LQAS design into macro-surveys while still obtaining results available through current sampling practices.
机译:>背景在许多国家,巨额投资和日益增加的全球疟疾预防和治疗优先次序已导致对计划监测和评估(M&E)的更多重视。许多国家目前使用大型多阶段整群抽样调查,以在区域和国家层面监控疟疾结果指标。但是,这些调查通常掩盖了对计划管理很重要的本地级可变性。批次质量保证抽样(LQAS)在地方计划M&E中发挥了重要作用。如果将其纳入这些较大的调查中,它将以很少的费用(如果有的话)提供全面的M&E计划。>方法莫桑比克卫生部于2007年6月和2007年7月进行了疟疾指标调查(MIS)。我们将LQAS分类规则应用于345个采样点区域,以展示针对两个疟疾计划指标(“家庭拥有任何蚊帐”和“家庭拥有任何经过杀虫剂处理的蚊帐(ITN)”)的高绩效和低绩效区域。 。>结果如MIS所示,莫桑比克的任何省都没有实现家庭拥有蚊帐或ITN的覆盖率目标达到70%。通过将LQAS分类规则应用于数据,我们确定345个枚举区域中的266个蚊帐覆盖率严重低于70%的目标。确定了另外73个ITN覆盖率较低的国家。>结论本文证明了将LQAS集成到多阶段整群抽样调查中并利用这些结果支持全面的国家,地区和地方计划M&E系统的可行性。此外,在建议中,我们概述了如何将大国LQAS设计整合到宏观调查中,同时仍可通过当前的采样方法获得可用的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号