首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Promotion International >Learning reflexively from a health promotion professional development program in Canada
【2h】

Learning reflexively from a health promotion professional development program in Canada

机译:从加拿大的健康促进专业发展计划中反思性学习

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In recent decades, reflexivity has received much attention in the professional education and training literature, especially in the public health and health promotion fields. Despite general agreement on the importance of reflexivity, there appears to be no consensus on how to assess reflexivity or to conceptualize the different forms developed among professionals and participants of training programs. This paper presents an analysis of the reflexivity outcomes of the Health Promotion Laboratory, an innovative professional development program aimed at supporting practice changes among health professionals by fostering competency development and reflexivity. More specifically, this paper explores the difference between two levels of reflexivity (formative and critical) and highlights some implications of each for practice. Data were collected through qualitative interviews with participants from two intervention sites. Results showed that involvement in the Health Promotion Laboratory prompted many participants to modify their vision of their practice and professional role, indicating an impact on reflexivity. In many cases, new understandings seem to have played a formative function in enabling participants to improve their practice and their role as health promoters. The reflective process also served a critical function culminating in a social and moral understanding of the impacts on society of the professionals' practices and roles. This type of outcome is greatly desired in health promotion, given the social justice and equity concerns of this field of practice. By redefining the theoretical concept of reflexivity on two levels and discussing their impacts on practice, this study supports the usefulness of both levels of reflexivity.
机译:在最近的几十年中,自反性在专业教育和培训文献中,特别是在公共卫生和健康促进领域受到了广泛的关注。尽管人们普遍认为反身性的重要性,但在如何评估反身性或概念化专业人员和培训计划参与者之间发展出的不同形式方面似乎尚未达成共识。本文对“健康促进实验室”的反射性结果进行了分析,这是一项创新的专业发展计划,旨在通过促进能力发展和反射性来支持卫生专业人员之间的实践变化。更具体地说,本文探讨了自反和自反两个级别(形成性和关键性)之间的差异,并强调了每种反射对实践的一些影响。通过与来自两个干预地点的参与者进行的定性访谈收集了数据。结果表明,参与健康促进实验室促使许多参与者改变了他们对自己的实践和专业角色的看法,表明对反身性的影响。在许多情况下,新的理解似乎在使参与者改善其实践及其作为健康促进者的作用方面起了形成作用。反思过程还起着至关重要的作用,最终形成了对专业人员的做法和角色对社会的影响的社会和道德理解。考虑到该实践领域的社会正义和公平问题,在健康促进中非常需要这种类型的结果。通过在两个层面上重新定义自反性的理论概念并讨论它们对实践的影响,本研究支持了自反性两个层面的有用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号