首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Policy and Planning >The cost of preventing undernutrition: cost cost-efficiency and cost-effectiveness of three cash-based interventions on nutrition outcomes in Dadu Pakistan
【2h】

The cost of preventing undernutrition: cost cost-efficiency and cost-effectiveness of three cash-based interventions on nutrition outcomes in Dadu Pakistan

机译:预防营养不良的成本:巴基斯坦达都的三种基于现金的营养成果干预措施的成本成本效益和成本效益

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cash-based interventions (CBIs) increasingly are being used to deliver humanitarian assistance and there is growing interest in the cost-effectiveness of cash transfers for preventing undernutrition in emergency contexts. The objectives of this study were to assess the costs, cost-efficiency and cost-effectiveness in achieving nutrition outcomes of three CBIs in southern Pakistan: a ‘double cash’ (DC) transfer, a ‘standard cash’ (SC) transfer and a ‘fresh food voucher’ (FFV) transfer. Cash and FFVs were provided to poor households with children aged 6–48 months for 6 months in 2015. The SC and FFV interventions provided $14 monthly and the DC provided $28 monthly. Cost data were collected via institutional accounting records, interviews, programme observation, document review and household survey. Cost-effectiveness was assessed as cost per case of wasting, stunting and disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted. Beneficiary costs were higher for the cash groups than the voucher group. Net total cost transfer ratios (TCTRs) were estimated as 1.82 for DC, 2.82 for SC and 2.73 for FFV. Yet, despite the higher operational costs, the FFV TCTR was lower than the SC TCTR when incorporating the participation cost to households, demonstrating the relevance of including beneficiary costs in cost-efficiency estimations. The DC intervention achieved a reduction in wasting, at $4865 per case averted; neither the SC nor the FFV interventions reduced wasting. The cost per case of stunting averted was $1290 for DC, $882 for SC and $883 for FFV. The cost per DALY averted was $641 for DC, $434 for SC and $563 for FFV without discounting or age weighting. These interventions are highly cost-effective by international thresholds. While it is debatable whether these resource requirements represent a feasible or sustainable investment given low health expenditures in Pakistan, these findings may provide justification for continuing Pakistan’s investment in national social safety nets.
机译:基于现金的干预越来越多地用于提供人道主义援助,人们越来越关注现金转移的成本效益,以防止紧急情况下的营养不良。这项研究的目的是评估巴基斯坦南部三个CBI取得营养成果的成本,成本效率和成本效益:“双现金”(DC)转移,“标准现金”(SC)转移和“现金”转移。 “新鲜食品券”(FFV)转移。 2015年,向有6至48个月月龄子女的贫困家庭提供了现金和FFV,为期6个月。SC和FFV干预措施每月提供14美元,DC每月提供28美元。成本数据是通过机构会计记录,访谈,计划观察,文件审查和家庭调查收集的。成本效益评估为每例避免浪费,发育迟缓和残疾调整生命年(DALY)的成本。现金组的受益人费用高于凭证组。净总成本转移比率(TCTR)估计为DC为1.82,SC为2.82,FFV为2.73。然而,尽管运营成本较高,但在将参与成本计入家庭时,FFV TCTR低于SC TCTR,这表明将受益成本纳入成本效益估算的相关性。区议会的干预减少了浪费,每例避免了$ 4865; SC和FFV干预均未减少浪费。避免发育迟缓的每箱成本DC为1290美元,SC为882美元,FFV为883美元。避免折现或年龄加权的平均每个DALY的成本为DC 641美元,SC 434美元,FFV 563美元。按照国际标准,这些干预措施具有很高的成本效益。考虑到巴基斯坦的医疗卫生支出低廉,这些资源需求是可行的还是可持续的投资尚有争议,但这些发现可能为巴基斯坦继续投资于国家社会安全网提供理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号