首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology >Interatrial shunt for chronic pulmonary hypertension: differential impact of low-flow vs. high-flow shunting
【2h】

Interatrial shunt for chronic pulmonary hypertension: differential impact of low-flow vs. high-flow shunting

机译:房间分流治疗慢性肺动脉高压:低流量分流与高流量分流的不同影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of the present study was to determine for the first time the qualitative and quantitative impact of varying degrees of interatrial shunting on right heart dynamics and systemic perfusion in subjects with chronic pulmonary hypertension (CPH). Eight dogs underwent 3 mo of progressive pulmonary artery banding, following which right atrial and ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic pressure-volume relations were calculated using conductance catheters. An 8-mm shunt prosthesis was inserted between the superior vena cava and left atrium, yielding a controlled model of atrial septostomy. Data were obtained 1) preshunt or “CPH”; 2) “Low-Flow” shunt; and 3) “High-Flow” shunt (occluding superior vena cava forcing all flow through the shunt). With progressive shunting, right ventricular pressure fell from 72 ± 19 mmHg (CPH) to 54 ± 17 mmHg (Low-Flow) and 47 ± 17 mmHg (High-Flow) (P < 0.001). Cardiac output increased from 1.5 ± 0.3 l/min at CPH to 1.8 ± 0.4 l/min at Low-Flow (286 ± 105 ml/min, 15% of cardiac output; P < 0.001), but returned to 1.6 ± 0.3 l/min at High-Flow (466 ± 172 ml/min, 29% of cardiac output; P = 0.008 vs. Low-Flow, P = 0.21 vs. CPH). There was a modest rise in systemic oxygen delivery from 252 ± 46 ml/min at CPH to 276 ± 50 ml/min at Low-Flow (P = 0.07), but substantial fall to 222 ± 50 ml/min at High-Flow (P = 0.005 vs. CPH, P < 0.001 vs. Low-Flow). With progressive shunting, bichamber contractility did not change (P = 0.98), but the slope of the right atrial end-diastolic pressure volume relation decreased (P < 0.04), consistent with improved compliance. This study demonstrated that Low-Flow interatrial shunting consistently improved right atrial mechanics and systemic perfusion in subjects with CPH, while High-Flow exceeded an “ideal shunt fraction”.
机译:本研究的目的是首次确定不同程度的心房分流对慢性肺动脉高压(CPH)患者右心动力和全身灌注的定性和定量影响。 8只狗进行了3个月的进行性肺动脉束带,随后使用电导导管计算了右心房和心室的收缩末期和舒张末期的压力-体积关系。在上腔静脉和左心房之间插入一个8毫米的分流假体,从而形成可控的房间隔造口术模型。获得数据1)预分流或“ CPH”; 2)“低流量”分流器; 3)“高流量”分流器(阻塞上腔静脉迫使所有血流通过分流器)。随着进行性分流,右心室压力从72±19 mmHg(CPH)降至54±17 mmHg(低流量)和47±17 mmHg(高流量)(P <0.001)。心输出量从CPH时的1.5±0.3 l / min增加到低流量时的1.8±0.4 l / min(286±105 ml / min,心输出量的15%; P <0.001),但恢复到1.6±0.3 l / min高流量(466±172 ml / min,心输出量的29%;相对于低流量,P = 0.008,相对于CPH,P = 0.21)的最小分钟数。全身供氧量从CPH时的252±46 ml / min适度上升到低流量时的276±50 ml / min(P = 0.07),而高流量时则大幅下降至222±50 ml / min(对于CPH,P = 0.005;对于低流量,P <0.001)。随着进行性分流,双室收缩力没有变化(P = 0.98),但右心房舒张末期压力容积关系的斜率降低了(P <0.04),与依从性改善相关。这项研究表明,低血流性房性分流能够持续改善CPH患者的右心房力学和全身灌注,而高血流性则超过了“理想分流分数”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号