首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Medicine and Life >Bipolar resection of the bladder and prostate – Initial experience with a newly developed regular sized loop resectoscope
【2h】

Bipolar resection of the bladder and prostate – Initial experience with a newly developed regular sized loop resectoscope

机译:膀胱和前列腺双极切除–使用新开发的常规尺寸的初步经验环形电切镜

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: Bipolar transurethral resection (TUR) has been introduced in the clinical practice nowadays. Benefits from bipolar TUR are represented by the use of saline irrigation, which avoids hypoosmotic hyperhydration (TUR–Syndrome), as well as by the reduced risk of obturator nerve stimulation. However, the previously introduced smaller bipolar resection loop caused prolonged operating–time. We report our initial experience with a newly developed regular sized loop for a bipolar resectoscope.>Materials and Methods: Different loop calibers and configurations were tested and compared to a previously introduced bipolar system and conventional resection devices in TUR of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and bladder tumors (TURP and TURBT). The resected tissue was pathologically examined for thermal damage and compared to a control group of monopolar conventionally resected tissue.>Results: The handling of the resectoscope was comparable to that of the conventional ones. Cutting control, cutting speed and coagulation effectiveness were excellent, and no obturator nerve stimulation occurred. The resection area could easily be assessed and tissue examination showed no differences in terms of quality and quantity of thermal damages, since tissue carbonization was reduced. There was no sticking of the resected tissue on the loop.>Conclusion: Regular sized loop bipolar resection is safe and efficient. Coagulation and cutting extent control seem superior to conventional TUR. Due to reduced carbonization, the resection ground can be easily assessed. The risk of obturator nerve stimulation is reduced. The histological quality of the tissue is not impaired. This device combines the advantage of a regular size resection loop with bipolar resection in normal saline. It has the potential to become a valuable alternative to monopolar TUR.
机译:>目的:如今,双极型经尿道切除术(TUR)已被引入临床实践。双极型TUR的好处在于使用盐水冲洗可以避免低渗性水合作用过多(TUR–综合征),以及减少闭孔神经刺激的风险。但是,先前引入的较小的双极切除环导致手术时间延长。我们报告了我们在新开发的用于双极电切镜的常规尺寸环上的初步经验。>材料和方法:测试了不同的环口径和配置,并将其与先前引入的双极系统和TUR的传统切除装置进行了比较。良性前列腺增生(BPH)和膀胱肿瘤(TURP和TURBT)。对切​​除的组织进行病理学检查以检查热损伤,并与对照组的常规常规单极切除组织进行比较。>结果:电切镜的操作与传统的电切镜相当。切割控制,切割速度和凝血效果极好,并且没有发生闭孔神经刺激。切除区域可以容易评估,组织检查显示无差异自热损伤的质量和数量方面组织碳化减少。没有粘住切除>上的组织。>结论:常规大小的loop双极切除术是安全高效。凝结和切割程度控制似乎更好到传统的TUR。由于碳化减少,切除地面很容易评估。闭孔神经刺激的风险降低了。组织的组织学质量不会受到损害。该设备结合了常规尺寸切除环的优势在生理盐水中进行双极切除。它有可能成为单极TUR的宝贵替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号