首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Epigenomics >Base resolution methylome profiling: considerations in platform selection data preprocessing and analysis
【2h】

Base resolution methylome profiling: considerations in platform selection data preprocessing and analysis

机译:基本分辨率的甲基化分析:平台选择数据预处理和分析中的注意事项

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Bisulfite treatment-based methylation microarray (mainly Illumina 450K Infinium array) and next-generation sequencing (reduced representation bisulfite sequencing, Agilent SureSelect Human Methyl-Seq, NimbleGen SeqCap Epi CpGiant or whole-genome bisulfite sequencing) are commonly used for base resolution DNA methylome research. Although multiple tools and methods have been developed and used for the data preprocessing and analysis, confusions remains for these platforms including how and whether the 450k array should be normalized; which platform should be used to better fit researchers’ needs; and which statistical models would be more appropriate for differential methylation analysis. This review presents the commonly used platforms and compares the pros and cons of each in methylome profiling. We then discuss approaches to study design, data normalization, bias correction and model selection for differentially methylated individual CpGs and regions.
机译:基于亚硫酸氢盐处理的甲基化微阵列(主要是Illumina 450K Infinium阵列)和下一代测序(亚硫酸氢盐还原表示法,Agilent SureSelect Human Methyl-Seq,NimbleGen SeqCap Epi CpGiant或全基因组亚硫酸氢盐测序)通常用于基本分辨率DNA甲基化测序。研究。尽管已经开发了多种工具和方法来进行数据预处理和分析,但是这些平台仍然存在困惑,包括如何以及是否应该对450k阵列进行规范化。应该使用哪个平台来更好地满足研究人员的需求;以及哪种统计模型更适合差异甲基化分析。这篇综述介绍了常用的平台,并比较了每个人在甲基化组分析中的利弊。然后,我们讨论了针对差异甲基化的单个CpG和区域研究设计,数据归一化,偏差校正和模型选择的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号