首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Diabetes Technology Therapeutics >Insulin Pump and Continuous Glucose Monitor Initiation in Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
【2h】

Insulin Pump and Continuous Glucose Monitor Initiation in Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

机译:住院的2型糖尿病患者的胰岛素泵和连续血糖监测启动

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) are commonly used by patients with diabetes mellitus in the outpatient setting. The efficacy and safety of initiating inpatient insulin pumps and CGM in the nonintensive care unit setting is unknown.>Materials and Methods: In a prospective pilot study, inpatients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive standard subcutaneous basal-bolus insulin and blinded CGM (group 1, n = 5), insulin pump and blinded CGM (group 2, n = 6), or insulin pump and nonblinded CGM (group 3, n = 5). Feasibility, glycemic control, and patient satisfaction were evaluated among groups.>Results: Group 1 had lower mean capillary glucose levels, 144.5 ± 19.5 mg/dL, compared with groups 2 and 3, 191.5 ± 52.3 and 182.7 ± 59.9 mg/dL (P1 vs. 2+3 = 0.05). CGM detected 19 hypoglycemic episodes (glucose <70 mg/dL) among all treatment groups, compared with 12 episodes detected by capillary testing, although not statistically significant. No significant differences were found for the total daily dose of insulin or percentage of time spent below target glucose range (<90 mg/dL), in target glucose range (90–180 mg/dL), or above target glucose range (>180 mg/dL). On the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-Change, group 3 reported increased hyperglycemia and decreased hypoglycemia frequency compared with the other two groups, although the differences did not reach statistical significance.>Conclusions: Insulin pump and CGM initiation are feasible during hospitalization, although they are labor intensive. Although insulin pump initiation may not lead to improved glycemic control, there is a trend toward CGM detecting a greater number of hypoglycemic episodes. Larger studies are needed to determine whether use of this technology can lower inpatient morbidity and mortality.
机译:>背景:糖尿病患者在门诊患者中通常使用胰岛素泵和连续葡萄糖监测(CGM)。在非重症监护病房设置住院胰岛素泵和CGM的有效性和安全性尚不清楚。>材料和方法:在一项前瞻性先导研究中,将2型糖尿病住院患者随机接受标准的皮下基底推注胰岛素和致盲的CGM(组1,n = 5),胰岛素泵和致盲的CGM(组2,n = 6)或胰岛素泵和非盲的CGM(组3,n = 5)。在各组之间评估可行性,血糖控制和患者满意度。>结果:与第2和第3组相比,第1组的平均毛细血管葡萄糖水平较低,为144.5±19.5μg/ dL,而第2和第3组为191.5±52.3和182.7。 ±59.9 mg / dL(P1 vs. 2 + 3 = 0.05)。 CGM在所有治疗组中检测到19个降血糖事件(葡萄糖<70μmg/ dL),而通过毛细血管测试检测到12个事件,尽管无统计学意义。每日总胰岛素剂量或低于目标血糖范围(<90 mg / dL),目标血糖范围(90–180 mg / dL)或高于目标血糖范围(> 180)的时间百分比均无显着差异毫克/分升)。关于糖尿病治疗满意度问卷调查,与其他两组相比,第3组报告了高血糖升高和低血糖发生频率降低,尽管差异没有统计学意义。>结论:胰岛素泵和CGM的启动是可行的在住院期间,尽管他们劳动强度大。尽管开始胰岛素泵可能不会改善血糖控制,但存在一种趋势,即CGM检测到更多的降血糖发作。需要更大的研究来确定使用该技术是否可以降低住院病人的发病率和死亡率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号