首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Briefings in Bioinformatics >Improving protein identification from tandem mass spectrometry data by one-step methods and integrating data from other platforms
【2h】

Improving protein identification from tandem mass spectrometry data by one-step methods and integrating data from other platforms

机译:通过一步方法并结合其他平台的数据来改善串联质谱数据中的蛋白质鉴定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Motivation: Many approaches have been proposed for the protein identification problem based on tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data. In these experiments, proteins are digested into peptides and the resulting peptide mixture is subjected to mass spectrometry. Some interesting putative peptide features (peaks) are selected from the mass spectra. Following that, the precursor ions undergo fragmentation and are analyzed by MS/MS. The process of identification of peptides from the mass spectra and the constituent proteins in the sample is called protein identification from MS/MS data. There are many two-step protein identification procedures, reviewed in the literature, which first attempt to identify the peptides in a separate process and then use these results to infer the proteins. However, in recent years, there have been attempts to provide a one-step solution to protein identification, which simultaneously identifies the proteins and the peptides in the sample. >Results: In this review, we briefly introduce the most popular two-step protein identification procedure, PeptideProphet coupled with ProteinProphet. Following that, we describe the difficulties with two-step procedures and review some recently introduced one-step protein/peptide identification procedures that do not suffer from these issues. The focus of this review is on one-step procedures that are based on statistical likelihood-based models, but some discussion of other one-step procedures is also included. We report comparative performances of one-step and two-step methods, which support the overall superiorities of one-step procedures. We also cover some recent efforts to improve protein identification by incorporating other molecular data along with MS/MS data.
机译:>动机:基于串联质谱(MS / MS)数据,针对蛋白质识别问题提出了许多方法。在这些实验中,蛋白质被消化成肽,然后将所得的肽混合物进行质谱分析。从质谱图中选择了一些有趣的推定肽特征(峰)。随后,前体离子发生碎裂,并通过MS / MS分析。从质谱鉴定样品中的肽和样品中的组成蛋白质的过程称为从MS / MS数据鉴定蛋白质。有许多两步的蛋白质鉴定程序,已在文献中进行了综述,它们首先尝试在单独的过程中鉴定肽,然后使用这些结果来推断蛋白质。然而,近年来,已经尝试提供一种一步的蛋白质鉴定解决方案,其同时鉴定样品中的蛋白质和肽。 >结果:在这篇综述中,我们简要介绍了最受欢迎的两步蛋白质鉴定程序,即PeptideProphet和ProteinProphet。随后,我们描述了两步法的困难,并回顾了一些最近推出的一步法蛋白质/肽鉴定方法,这些方法没有这些问题。本文的重点是基于统计似然模型的单步程序,但也包括对其他单步程序的一些讨论。我们报告了一步法和两步法方法的比较性能,它们支持了一步法程序的整体优势。我们还将介绍通过结合其他分子数据和MS / MS数据来改善蛋白质鉴定的一些最新努力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号