首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Diabetes Technology Therapeutics >Reduced Silent Occlusions with a Novel Catheter Infusion Set (BD FlowSmart): Results from Two Open-Label Comparative Studies
【2h】

Reduced Silent Occlusions with a Novel Catheter Infusion Set (BD FlowSmart): Results from Two Open-Label Comparative Studies

机译:使用新型导管输液器(BD FlowSmart)减少静默闭塞:两项开放标签比较研究的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Insulin pump users experience periods of unexplained hyperglycemia. In some cases these may be due to insulin flow interruptions termed “silent occlusions,” which occur without activating the pump alarm and may require set replacement.>Materials and Methods: In-line pressure profiles of a novel infusion set with a 6-mm, 28-gauge polymer, dual-ported catheter (BD FlowSmart™; Becton Dickinson and Co., Franklin Lakes, NJ) were compared with those of an existing infusion set (Quick-set®; Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, CA) in two separate studies involving insulin diluent infusions over 2.5–4.5-h periods in healthy adults without diabetes. Study 1, a pilot study (n = 25), compared the occurrence of flow interruption events (silent occlusions and/or occlusion alarms) between the two infusion sets and between manual or device-assisted insertion methods. Study 2 (n = 60) was designed to show ≥50% reduction in flow interruption events with the BD set after manual insertions. (Silent occlusions were defined by a continuous pressure rise for ≥30 min.)>Results: In Study 1, significantly fewer silent occlusions were seen with BD FlowSmart versus Quick-set infusion sets for both manual (three of 22 [13.6%] vs. 12 of 24 [50%]; P = 0.012) and mechanical (two of 24 [8.3%] vs. nine of 25 [36%]; P = 0.037) insertions, yielding risk reductions of 73% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25–91%) and 77% (95% CI, 17–94%), respectively. In Study 2, flow interruption events occurred in three of 117 (2.6%) and 12 of 118 (10.2%) BD FlowSmart and Quick-set infusion sets, respectively, yielding a 75% risk reduction (95% CI, 20–92%; P = 0.030). Percentage of time with flow interruption was significantly lower with BD sets in both studies (P < 0.02). Leakage (>0.5 IU or 5 μL) occurred infrequently and did not differ between sets.>Conclusions: A novel side-ported insulin infusion set demonstrated significant reductions in flow interruptions, including silent occlusions, versus a leading marketed set, which may improve insulin delivery.
机译:>背景:胰岛素泵使用者会遇到无法解释的高血糖时期。在某些情况下,这可能是由于胰岛素流动中断(称为“沉默闭塞”)引起的,这种中断在未激活泵警报的情况下发生,可能需要更换套件。>材料和方法:新型输液器的在线压力曲线将装有6毫米,28号聚合物的双端口导管(BD FlowSmart™; Becton Dickinson and Co.,Franklin Lakes,NJ)的固定装置与现有输液装置(Quick-set ®< / sup>; Medtronic MiniMed,Northridge,CA)在两项单独的研究中,涉及在没有糖尿病的健康成年人中2.5至4.5小时内注射胰岛素稀释剂。一项试验性研究(n = 25)进行了研究1,比较了两个输液器之间以及手动或设备辅助插入方法之间的流动中断事件(无声闭塞和/或闭塞警报)的发生。研究2(n = 60)被设计为显示在手动插入BD的情况下,流量中断事件减少了≥50%。 (通过持续不断的压力升高≥30分钟来定义无声闭塞。)>结果:在研究1中,对于两种手动操作,BD FlowSmart与快速设置输注器相比,无声闭塞的发生率要少得多(三个22(13.6%)对比24中的12(50%); P = 0.012)和机械插入(24中的2 [8.3%]对25(36%的比例为36 [36%]; P = 0.037)),降低了73的风险%(95%置信区间[CI],25–91%)和77%(95%CI,17–94%)。在研究2中,分别在117个(2.6%)的BD中的三个和118个(10.2%)的118个的12个(10.2%)中发生了流量中断事件,从而使风险降低了75%(95%CI,20-92%) ; P = 0.030)。在两项研究中,BD组的血流中断时间百分比显着降低(P <0.02)。很少发生泄漏(> 0.5 IU或5μL),并且两组之间没有差异。>结论:与领先的市售产品相比,新型侧入式胰岛素输注套件显示出包括无声闭塞在内的血流中断显着减少。定型,可以改善胰岛素的输送。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号