首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America >Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Linezolid and Daptomycin in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infection: A National Cohort Study of Veterans Affairs Patients
【2h】

Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Linezolid and Daptomycin in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infection: A National Cohort Study of Veterans Affairs Patients

机译:利奈唑胺和达托霉素在耐万古霉素的肠球菌血流感染中的有效性和安全性比较:一项关于退伍军人事务患者的全国队列研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Background. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bloodstream infections (VRE-BSIs) are becoming increasingly common. Linezolid and daptomycin are the primary treatment options for VRE-BSI, but optimal treatment is unclear.>Methods. This was a national retrospective cohort study comparing linezolid and daptomycin for the treatment of VRE-BSI among Veterans Affairs Medical Center patients admitted during 2004–2013. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as a composite of (1) 30-day all-cause mortality; (2) microbiologic failure; and (3) 60-day VRE-BSI recurrence. Poisson regression was conducted to determine if antimicrobial treatment was independently associated with clinical outcomes.>Results. A total of 644 patients were included (linezolid, n = 319; daptomycin, n = 325). Overall, treatment failure was 60.9% (n = 392/644), and 30-day all-cause mortality was 38.2% (n = 246/644). Linezolid was associated with a significantly higher risk of treatment failure compared with daptomycin (risk ratio [RR], 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–1.67; P = .001). After adjusting for confounding factors in Poisson regression, the relationship between linezolid use and treatment failure persisted (adjusted RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02–1.30; P = .026). Linezolid was also associated with higher 30-day mortality (42.9% vs 33.5%; RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04–1.32; P = .014) and microbiologic failure rates (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02–1.18; P = .011). No difference in 60-day VRE-BSI recurrence was observed between treatment groups.>Conclusions. Treatment with linezolid for VRE-BSI resulted in significantly higher treatment failure in comparison to daptomycin. Linezolid treatment was also associated with greater 30-day all-cause mortality and microbiologic failure in this cohort.
机译:>背景。耐万古霉素的肠球菌血流感染(VRE-BSI)越来越普遍。利奈唑胺和达托霉素是VRE-BSI的主要治疗方法,但最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。>方法。这是一项全国性回顾性研究,比较了利奈唑胺和达托霉素治疗VRE-BSI的退伍军人事务医学。 2004-2013年期间收治的中心患者。主要结果是治疗失败,定义为:(1)30天全因死亡率; (2)微生物学上的失败; (3)60天VRE-BSI复发。进行泊松回归分析以确定抗菌药物治疗是否与临床结果独立相关。>结果。共纳入644例患者(利奈唑胺,n = 319;达托霉素,n = 325)。总体而言,治疗失败率为60.9%(n = 392/644),而30天全因死亡率为38.2%(n = 246/644)。与达托霉素相比,利奈唑胺与治疗失败的风险显着相关(风险比[RR]为1.37; 95%置信区间[CI]为1.13–1.67; P = 0.001)。在调整了Poisson回归中的混杂因素后,利奈唑胺使用与治疗失败之间的关系持续存在(调整后RR为1.15; 95%CI为1.02-1.30; P = .026)。利奈唑胺还具有较高的30天死亡率(42.9%比33.5%; RR,1.17; 95%CI,1.04–1.32; P = 0.014)和微生物学失败率(RR,1.10; 95%CI,1.02-1.18) ; P = .011)。治疗组之间的60天VRE-BSI复发无差异。>结论。与达托霉素相比,利奈唑胺治疗VRE-BSI导致治疗失败率明显更高。在该队列研究中,利奈唑胺治疗还与30天全因死亡率更高和微生物学衰竭有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号