首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America >Ethical Challenges and Lessons Learned During the Clinical Development of a Group A Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine
【2h】

Ethical Challenges and Lessons Learned During the Clinical Development of a Group A Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine

机译:脑膜炎球菌共轭疫苗临床开发过程中的伦理挑战和经验教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background. The group A meningococcal vaccine (PsA-TT) clinical development plan included clinical trials in India and in the West African region between 2005 and 2013. During this period, the Meningitis Vaccine Project (MVP) accumulated substantial experience in the ethical conduct of research to the highest standards.>Methods. Because of the public–private nature of the sponsorship of these trials and the extensive international collaboration with partners from a diverse setting of countries, the ethical review process was complex and required strategic, timely, and attentive communication to ensure the smooth review and approval for the clinical studies. Investigators and their site teams fostered strong community relationships prior to, during, and after the studies to ensure the involvement and the ownership of the research by the participating populations. As the clinical work proceeded, investigators and sponsors responded to specific questions of informed consent, pregnancy testing, healthcare, disease prevention, and posttrial access.>Results. Key factors that led to success included (1) constant dialogue between partners to explore and answer all ethical questions; (2) alertness and preparedness for emerging ethical questions during the research and in the context of evolving international ethics standards; and (3) care to assure that approaches were acceptable in the diverse community contexts.>Conclusions. Many of the ethical issues encountered during the PsA-TT clinical development are familiar to groups conducting field trials in different cultural settings. The successful approaches used by the MVP clinical team offer useful examples of how these problems were resolved.>Clinical Trials Registration. ISRCTN17662153 (PsA-TT-001); ISRTCN78147026 (PsA-TT-002); ISRCTN87739946 (PsA-TT-003); ISRCTN46335400 (PsA-TT-003a); ISRCTN82484612 (PsA-TT-004); CTRI/2009/091/000368 (PsA-TT-005); PACTR ATMR2010030001913177 (PsA-TT-006); PACTR201110000328305 (PsA-TT-007).
机译:>背景。 A组脑膜炎球菌疫苗(PsA-TT)临床开发计划包括2005年至2013年在印度和西非地区进行的临床试验。在此期间,脑膜炎疫苗项目(MVP)不断积累>方法。由于赞助这些试验的公私性质以及与来自不同国家/地区的合作伙伴的广泛国际合作,伦理审查过程很复杂,需要进行战略,及时和细心的沟通,以确保临床研究的顺利审查和批准。研究人员及其现场团队在研究之前,之中和之后建立了牢固的社区关系,以确保参与人群对研究的参与和拥有。随着临床工作的进行,研究者和申办者对知情同意书,妊娠试验,医疗保健,疾病预防和审后准入等具体问题做出了回应。>结果。成功的关键因素包括(1)持续不断的对话合作伙伴之间探讨和回答所有道德问题; (2)在研究过程中以及在不断发展的国际伦理标准的背景下,对新出现的伦理学问题保持警惕和准备; (3)注意确保方法在不同的社区环境中都可以接受。>结论。groups在PsA-TT临床开发过程中遇到的许多道德问题是在不同文化背景下进行田间试验的小组所熟悉的。 MVP临床团队使用的成功方法为解决这些问题提供了有用的实例。>临床试验注册。 ISRCTN17662153(PsA-TT-001); ISRTCN78147026(PsA-TT-002); ISRCTN87739946(PsA-TT-003); ISRCTN46335400(PsA-TT-003a); ISRCTN82484612(PsA-TT-004); CTRI / 2009/091/000368(PsA-TT-005); PACTR ATMR2010030001913177(PsA-TT-006); PACTR201110000328305(PsA-TT-007)。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号