首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America >Evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Hepatitis C Virus Testing in an Urban Emergency Department
【2h】

Evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Hepatitis C Virus Testing in an Urban Emergency Department

机译:疾病预防控制中心对城市急诊部门丙型肝炎病毒检测建议的评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends 1-time hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing in the 1945–1965 birth cohort, in addition to targeted risk-based testing. Emergency departments (EDs) are key venues for HCV testing because of the population served and success in HIV screening. We determined the burden of undocumented HCV infection in our ED, providing guidance for implementation of ED-based HCV testing.>Methods. An 8-week seroprevalence study was conducted in an urban ED in 2013. All patients with excess blood collected for clinical purposes were included. Demographic and clinical information including documented HCV infection was obtained from electronic medical records. HCV antibody testing was performed on excess samples.>Results. Of 4713 patients, 652 (13.8%) were HCV antibody positive. Of these, 204 (31.3%) had undocumented HCV infection. Among patients with undocumented infections, 99 (48.5%) would have been diagnosed based on birth cohort testing, and an additional 54 (26.5%) would be identified by risk-based testing. If our ED adhered to the CDC guidelines, 51 (25.0%) patients with undocumented HCV would not have been tested. Given an estimated 7727 unique ED patients with HCV infection in a 1-year period, birth cohort plus risk-based testing would identify 1815 undocumented infections, and universal testing would identify additional 526 HCV-infected persons.>Conclusions. Birth cohort–based testing would augment identification of undocumented HCV infections in this ED 2-fold, relative to risk-based testing only. However, our data demonstrate that one-quarter of infections would remain undiagnosed if current CDC birth cohort recommendations were employed, suggesting that in high-risk urban ED settings a practice of universal 1-time testing might be more effective.
机译:>背景。疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)建议在1945年至1965年的出生队列中进行一次丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)测试,此外还要进行基于风险的针对性测试。由于服务人群和艾滋病毒筛查的成功,急诊科(ED)是进行HCV检测的关键场所。我们确定了急诊室中未记录的HCV感染的负担,为实施基于急诊室的HCV检测提供了指导。>方法。 2013年在市区急诊室进行了为期8周的血清阳性率研究。包括为临床目的收集的多余血液。人口统计学和临床​​信息(包括已记录的HCV感染)是从电子病历中获得的。对过量样品进行了HCV抗体检测。>结果。在4713例患者中,有652例(13.8%)HCV抗体阳性。在这些患者中,有204(31.3%)人有未记录的HCV感染。在无证感染的患者中,根据出生队列测试将诊断出99例(48.5%),通过基于风险的测试可识别出另外54例(26.5%)。如果我们的ED遵守CDC指南,那么将不对51例(25.0%)HCV无证患者进行测试。假设在1年内估计有7727例ED HCV感染的独特ED患者,出生队列和基于风险的检测将发现1815例无证感染,而通用检测将再鉴定526例HCV感染者。>结论。基于队列研究的检测将使ED中未记录的HCV感染的识别率增加2倍,而仅基于风险的检测。但是,我们的数据表明,如果采用当前CDC出生队列建议,仍将无法诊断四分之一的感染,这表明在高危城市ED设置中,进行通用的1次检测可能更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号