首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of International Oral Health : JIOH >Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of Ceramic Veneer with three different incisal design preparations - An In-vitro Study
【2h】

Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of Ceramic Veneer with three different incisal design preparations - An In-vitro Study

机译:三种不同切牙设计准备对陶瓷贴面抗断裂性能的比较评估-体外研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Ceramic veneer fracture has occurred mainly at the incisal edge of the veneer because of greater stress. This study compares and evaluates the fracture resistance ceramic veneers with three different incisal preparations. >Materials & Methods: 15 human permanent maxillary central incisor extracted were selected which were divided into three groups of 5 each having a different Incial design Preparation. >Group 1: No Incisal reduction with facio- incisal bevel, >Group 2 : 1 mm incisal reduction with butt joint, >Group 3 : 1 mm incisal reduction with 1 mm height of Palatal chamfer. It was found that Group III had greater fracture resistance as compared to Group I and Group II. Group I had least fracture resistance as compared to Group II and III. Group II had greater fracture resistance as compared to Group I but less than Group III. >Results: Ceramic veneer with 1mm incisal reduction with 1mm height of palatal chamfer showed highest fracture resistance as compared to 1mm incisal reduction with butt joint and no incisal reduction with facial-incisal bevel, in order to achieve better esthetic and functional results. >Conclusion: The palatal chamfer margin results in preservation of some peripheral enamel layer, which eliminates the micro leakage at the palatal margin-restoration interface and also effectively counteracting shear stress. This design provides a definite seat for cementation.>How to cite the article:Jankar AS, Kale Y, Kangane S, Ambekar A, Sinha M, Chaware S. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of Ceramic Veneer with three different incisal design preparations - An In-vitro Study. J Int Oral Health 2014;6(1):48-54.
机译:>背景:由于应力较大,陶瓷贴面的断裂主要发生在贴面的切边。这项研究比较和评估了三种不同切牙准备的抗断裂陶瓷贴面。 >材料与方法:选取15例人类永久性上颌中切牙,将其分为3组,每组5例均采用不同的Incial设计制剂。 >第1组:没有切面斜切的切牙,>第2组:有对接切牙的切牙1 mm,>第3组:切牙的切牙1mm Pala骨倒角高度减少1毫米。发现与第一组和第二组相比,第三组具有更大的抗断裂性。与第二组和第三组相比,第一组的抗断裂性最低。与第一组相比,第二组具有更高的抗断裂性,但低于第三组。 >结果:为了达到更好的美观效果,与切角1mm的切牙相比,切面减小1mm的切面高度高1mm的陶瓷贴面具有最高的抗断裂性。和功能结果。 >结论: lat骨倒角边缘可保留一些外周釉质层,从而消除了margin骨边缘-修复界面的微渗漏并有效地抵消了切应力。这种设计为胶结提供了确定的位置。>如何引用该文章:Jankar AS,Kale Y,Kangane S,Ambekar A,Sinha M,Chaware S.使用三种不同的切牙设计准备对陶瓷贴面抗断裂性的比较评估-一项体外研究。国际口腔卫生杂志2014; 6(1):48-54。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号