首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition >Effect of changing the amount and type of fat and carbohydrate on insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular risk: the RISCK (Reading Imperial Surrey Cambridge and Kings) trial
【2h】

Effect of changing the amount and type of fat and carbohydrate on insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular risk: the RISCK (Reading Imperial Surrey Cambridge and Kings) trial

机译:改变脂肪和碳水化合物的数量和类型对胰岛素敏感性和心血管风险的影响:RISCK(雷丁帝国萨里剑桥和金斯)试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Insulin sensitivity (Si) is improved by weight loss and exercise, but the effects of the replacement of saturated fatty acids (SFAs) with monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) or carbohydrates of high glycemic index (HGI) or low glycemic index (LGI) are uncertain.>Objective: We conducted a dietary intervention trial to study these effects in participants at risk of developing metabolic syndrome.>Design: We conducted a 5-center, parallel design, randomized controlled trial [RISCK (Reading, Imperial, Surrey, Cambridge, and Kings)]. The primary and secondary outcomes were changes in Si (measured by using an intravenous glucose tolerance test) and cardiovascular risk factors. Measurements were made after 4 wk of a high-SFA and HGI (HS/HGI) diet and after a 24-wk intervention with HS/HGI (reference), high-MUFA and HGI (HM/HGI), HM and LGI (HM/LGI), low-fat and HGI (LF/HGI), and LF and LGI (LF/LGI) diets.>Results: We analyzed data for 548 of 720 participants who were randomly assigned to treatment. The median Si was 2.7 × 10−4 mL · μU−1 · min−1 (interquartile range: 2.0, 4.2 × 10−4 mL · μU−1 · min−1), and unadjusted mean percentage changes (95% CIs) after 24 wk treatment (P = 0.13) were as follows: for the HS/HGI group, −4% (−12.7%, 5.3%); for the HM/HGI group, 2.1% (−5.8%, 10.7%); for the HM/LGI group, −3.5% (−10.6%, 4.3%); for the LF/HGI group, −8.6% (−15.4%, −1.1%); and for the LF/LGI group, 9.9% (2.4%, 18.0%). Total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B concentrations decreased with SFA reduction. Decreases in TC and LDL-cholesterol concentrations were greater with LGI. Fat reduction lowered HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 and B concentrations.>Conclusions: This study did not support the hypothesis that isoenergetic replacement of SFAs with MUFAs or carbohydrates has a favorable effect on Si. Lowering GI enhanced reductions in TC and LDL-cholesterol concentrations in subjects, with tentative evidence of improvements in Si in the LF-treatment group. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as ISRCTN29111298.
机译:>背景:减肥和锻炼可改善胰岛素敏感性(Si),但是用单不饱和脂肪酸(MUFA)或高血糖指数(HGI)的碳水化合物替代饱和脂肪酸(SFA)的效果)或低血糖指数(LGI)不确定。>目标:我们进行了饮食干预试验,以研究有代谢综合征风险的参与者的这些影响。>设计: 5中心平行设计的随机对照试验[RISCK(雷丁,帝国,萨里,剑桥和国王)。主要和次要结局是Si的变化(使用静脉葡萄糖耐量试验测量)和心血管危险因素。在4周高SFA和HGI(HS / HGI)饮食之后,以及在对HS / HGI(参考),高MUFA和HGI(HM / HGI),HM和LGI(HM)进行24周干预后进行测量/ LGI),低脂和HGI(LF / HGI)以及LF和LGI(LF / LGI)饮食。>结果:我们分析了随机分配给720名参与者的548名患者的数据。 Si中位数为2.7×10 −4 mL·μU −1 ·min −1 (四分位间距:2.0,4.2×10 −4 mL·μU −1 ·min -1 ),以及24周治疗后未经调整的平均百分比变化(95%CI)(P = 0.13) )如下:对于HS / HGI组,为-4%(-12.7%,5.3%); HM / HGI组为2.1%(−5.8%,10.7%); HM / LGI组为-3.5%(−10.6%,4.3%); LF / HGI组为-8.6%(-15.4%,-1.1%); LF / LGI组为9.9%(2.4%,18.0%)。随着SFA降低,总胆固醇(TC),LDL胆固醇和载脂蛋白B浓度降低。 LGI对TC和LDL-胆固醇浓度的降低更大。减少脂肪可以降低HDL胆固醇和载脂蛋白A1和B的浓度。>结论:该研究不支持MUFA或碳水化合物同能替代SFA对Si有有利作用的假说。降低GI可增强受试者TC和LDL胆固醇浓度的降低,并初步证明LF治疗组的Si改善。该试验已在Clinicaltrials.gov上注册为ISRCTN29111298。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号