首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition >Beverage consumption appetite and energy intake: what did you expect?
【2h】

Beverage consumption appetite and energy intake: what did you expect?

机译:饮料消费食欲和能量摄入:您期望什么?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Beverage consumption is implicated in the overweight/obesity epidemic through the weaker energy compensation response it elicits compared with solid food forms. However, plausible mechanisms are not documented.>Objective: This study assessed the cognitive and sensory contributions of differential postingestive responses to energy- and macronutrient-matched liquid (in beverage form) and solid food forms and identifies physiologic processes that may account for them.>Design: Fifty-two healthy adults [mean ± SD age: 24.7 ± 5.5 y; BMI (in kg/m2): 26.3 ± 6.3] completed this randomized, 4-arm crossover study. Participants consumed oral liquid and solid preloads that they perceived, through cognitive manipulation, to be liquid or solid in their stomach (ie, oral liquid/perceived gastric liquid, oral liquid/perceived gastric solid, oral solid/perceived gastric liquid, or oral solid/perceived gastric solid). However, all preloads were designed to present a liquid gastric challenge. Appetite, gastric-emptying and orocecal transit times, and selected endocrine responses were monitored for the following 4 h; total energy intake was also recorded.>Results: Oral-liquid and perceived gastric-liquid preloads elicited greater postprandial hunger and lower fullness sensations, more rapid gastric-emptying and orocecal transit times, attenuated insulin and glucagon-like peptide 1 release, and lower ghrelin suppression than did responses after oral-solid and perceived gastric-solid treatments (all P < 0.05). Faster gastric-emptying times were significantly associated with greater energy intake after consumption of perceived gastric-liquid preloads (P < 0.05). Energy intake was greater on days when perceived gastric-liquid preloads were consumed than when perceived gastric solids were consumed (2311 ± 95 compared with 1897 ± 72 kcal, P = 0.007).>Conclusions: These data document sensory and cognitive effects of food form on ingestive behavior and identify physical and endocrine variables that may account for the low satiety value of beverages. They are consistent with findings that clear, energy-yielding beverages pose a particular risk for positive energy balance. This study was registered at as NCT01070199.
机译:>背景:与固体食物形式相比,饮料引起的能量补偿反应较弱,与超重/肥胖症流行有关。但是,尚无合理的机制。>目的:该研究评估了能量和大量营养匹配的液体(饮料形式)和固体食物形式的不同postestiveive反应的认知和感觉贡献,并确定了生理过程>设计: 52位健康的成年人[平均±SD年龄:24.7±5.5岁; BMI(kg / m 2 ):26.3±6.3]完成了这项随机四臂交叉研究。参与者消耗了他们通过认知操纵感知到的在他的胃中为液态或固态的口服液和固体预紧物(即口服液/感知到的胃液,口服液/感知到的胃液,口服固体/感知到的胃液或口服固体) /感知到的胃固体)。但是,所有的预紧力都被设计为对胃液提出挑战。在接下来的4小时内监测食欲,胃排空和口腔的渡越时间以及选择的内分泌反应。还记录了总的能量摄入。>结果:口服液和感知到的胃液预负荷会引起更大的餐后饥饿和较低的饱腹感,更快速的胃排空和口经时间,胰岛素和胰高血糖素样物质减弱与口服固体和胃固形物治疗后相比,肽1释放和生长激素释放肽抑制作用降低(所有P <0.05)。消耗感知的胃液预负荷后,更快的胃排空时间与更大的能量摄入显着相关(P <0.05)。消耗感知到的胃液预紧力的日子比摄入感知到的胃固形物的能量摄入更多(2311±95比1897±72 kcal,P = 0.007)。>结论:形式对饮食行为的认知和认知影响,并识别可能导致饮料饱腹感低的生理和内分泌变量。它们与发现明确的,高能饮料构成正能量平衡的特殊风险的发现一致。该研究的注册号为NCT01070199。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号