首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses >AIDS Vaccines and Preexposure Prophylaxis: Is Synergy Possible?
【2h】

AIDS Vaccines and Preexposure Prophylaxis: Is Synergy Possible?

机译:艾滋病疫苗和暴露前预防:是否可能产生协同作用?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While the long-term goal is to develop highly effective AIDS vaccines, first generation vaccines may be only partially effective. Other HIV prevention modalities such as preexposure prophylaxis with antiretrovirals (PrEP) may have limited efficacy as well. The combined administration of vaccine and PrEP (VAXPREP), however, may have a synergistic effect leading to an overall benefit that is greater than the sum of the individual effects. We propose two test-of-concept trial designs for an AIDS vaccine plus oral or topical ARV. In one design, evidence that PrEP reduces the risk of HIV acquisition is assumed to justify offering it to all participants. A two-arm study comparing PrEP alone to VAXPREP is proposed in which 30 to 60 incident infections are observed to assess the additional benefit of vaccination on risk of infection and setpoint viral load. The demonstrated superiority of VAXPREP does not imply vaccine alone is efficacious. Similarly, the lack of superiority does not imply vaccine alone is ineffective, as antagonism could exist between vaccine and PrEP. In the other design, PrEP is assumed not to be in general use. A 2 × 2 factorial design is proposed in which high-risk individuals are randomized to one of four arms: placebo vaccine given with placebo PrEP, placebo vaccine given with PrEP, vaccine given with placebo PrEP, or VAXPREP. Between 60 and 210 infections are required to detect a benefit of vaccination with or without PrEP on risk of HIV acquisition or setpoint viral load, with fewer infections needed when synergy is present.
机译:虽然长期目标是开发高效的艾滋病疫苗,但第一代疫苗可能仅部分有效。其他HIV预防方法,例如用抗逆转录病毒药物(PrEP)进行暴露前预防也可能具有有限的疗效。但是,疫苗和PrEP的联合给药(VAXPREP)可能具有协同作用,从而产生的总体效益要大于单个效应的总和。我们提出了两种概念测试试验设计,分别是艾滋病疫苗和口服或局部抗逆转录病毒药物。在一种设计中,PrEP降低了HIV感染风险的证据被认为有理由向所有参与者提供。提出了一项将单独的PrEP与VAXPREP进行比较的两臂研究,其中观察到30到60个事件感染,以评估接种疫苗对感染风险和设定病毒载量的额外好处。 VAXPREP的优越性并不意味着单独使用疫苗即可有效。同样,缺乏优势并不意味着仅疫苗是无效的,因为疫苗和PrEP之间可能存在拮抗作用。在另一种设计中,假定PrEP不通用。提出了一种2××2析因设计,其中高风险个体被随机分配到以下四个方面之一:安慰剂PrEP给予安慰剂疫苗,PrEP安慰剂给予PrEP,安慰剂PrEP给予疫苗或VAXPREP。检测有或没有PrEP疫苗接种对HIV感染或设定病毒载量风险的益处,需要60到210个感染才能检测到,而在存在协同作用时,需要的感染更少。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号