首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The American Journal of Occupational Therapy >Predicting Older Driver On-Road Performance by Means of the UsefulField of View and Trail Making Test Part B
【2h】

Predicting Older Driver On-Road Performance by Means of the UsefulField of View and Trail Making Test Part B

机译:通过有用的方法预测较老的驾驶员的道路行驶性能视场和追踪制作测试B部分

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Useful Field of View® (UFOV) and Trail Making Test Part B (Trails B) are measures of divided attention. We determined which measure was more accurate in predicting on-road outcomes among drivers (N = 198, mean age = 73.86, standard deviation = 6.05). Receiver operating characteristic curves for the UFOV (Risk Index [RI] and Subtests 1–3) and Trails B significantly predicted on-road outcomes. Contrasting Trails B with the UFOV RI and subtests, the only difference was found between the UFOV RI and Trails B, indicating the UFOV RI was the best predictor of on-road outcomes. Misclassifications of drivers totaled 28 for the UFOV RI, 62 for Trails B, and 58 for UFOV Subtest 2. The UFOV RI is a superior test in predicting on-road outcomes, but the Trails B has acceptable accuracy and is comparable to the other UFOV subtests.
机译:有用视野®(UFOV)和跟踪制作测试B部分(跟踪B)是关注度的衡量标准。我们确定了哪种方法可以更准确地预测驾驶员的上路结果(N = 198,平均年龄= 73.86,标准差= 6.05)。 UFOV(风险指数[RI]和子测试1-3)和路径B的接收器工作特性曲线显着预测了道路上的结果。将路径B与UFOV RI和子测试进行对比,发现UFOV RI和路径B之间的唯一区别是UFOV RI是道路结果的最佳预测指标。对于UFOV RI,驾驶员的错误分类总计为28,对于B径为62,对于UFOV子测验2为58。UFOV RI在预测道路结果方面是一种出色的测试,但是B径具有可接受的准确性,可以与其他UFOV媲美。子测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号