首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Age and ageing >Community falls prevention for people who call an emergency ambulance after a fall: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial
【2h】

Community falls prevention for people who call an emergency ambulance after a fall: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial

机译:跌倒后呼叫紧急救护车的人的社区跌倒预防:经济评估和随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: we estimated the cost-effectiveness of a community falls prevention service compared with usual care from a National Health Service and personal social services perspective over the 12 month trial period.>Design: a cost-effectiveness and cost utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial>Setting: community.>Participants: people over 60 years of age living at home or in residential care who had fallen and called an emergency ambulance but were not taken to hospital.>Interventions: referral to community fall prevention services or usual health and social care.>Measurements: incremental cost per fall prevented and incremental cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)>Results: a total of 157 participants (82 interventions and 75 controls) were used to perform the economic evaluation. The mean difference in NHS and personal social service costs between the groups was £-1,551 per patient over 1 year (95% CI: £-5,932 to £2,829) comparing the intervention and control groups. The intervention patients experienced on average 5.34 fewer falls over 12 months (95% CI: −7.06 to −3.62). The mean difference in QALYs was 0.070 (95% CI: −0.010 to 0.150) in favour of the intervention group.>Conclusion: the community falls prevention service was estimated to be cost-effective in this high-risk group. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN67535605. (controlled-trials.com)
机译:>目标:我们在12个月的试用期内从国家卫生服务和个人社会服务的角度估计了预防社区摔倒与常规护理相比的成本效益。>设计:成本效益和成本效用分析以及随机对照试验>设置:社区。>参与者: 60岁以上在家中或住院治疗中跌倒的人并叫了紧急救护车,但没有送往医院。>干预措施:转介社区跌倒预防服务或常规的健康和社会护理。>措施:预防每次跌倒的成本增加每质量调整生命年(QALYs)的成本>结果:总共157名参与者(82名干预措施和75名对照)用于进行经济评估。与干预组和对照组相比,两组患者在1年中的NHS和个人社会服务成本的平均差额为£-1,551(95%CI:-5,932英镑至2,829英镑)。干预患者在12个月内跌倒的次数平均减少了5.34(95%CI:−7.06至−3.62)。有利于干预组的QALYs平均差异为0.070(95%CI:-0.010至0.150)。>结论:据估计,在这种高风险人群中,预防社区跌倒服务具有成本效益。组。电流对照试验ISRCTN67535605。 (control-trials.com)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号