首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Aging (Albany NY) >Individualizing treatment targets for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: factors influencing clinical decision making in the 24-week randomized INTERVAL study
【2h】

Individualizing treatment targets for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: factors influencing clinical decision making in the 24-week randomized INTERVAL study

机译:老年2型糖尿病患者的个体化治疗目标:在24周随机INTERVAL研究中影响临床决策的因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We tested the feasibility of setting individualized glycemic goals and factors influencing targets set in a clinical trial in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 45 outpatient centers in seven European countries. 278 drug-naïve or inadequately controlled (mean HbA1c 7.9%) patients with type 2 diabetes aged ≥70 years with HbA1c levels ≥7.0% and ≤10.0% were enrolled. Investigator-defined individualized HbA1c targets and the impact of baseline characteristics on individualized treatment targets was evaluated.The average individualized HbA1c target was set at 7.0%. HbA1c at baseline predicted a target setting such that higher the HbA1c, more aggressive was the target (P<0.001). Men were more likely to be set aggressive targets than women (P=0.026). Frailty status of patients showed a trend towards significance (P=0.068), whereas diabetes duration, age, or polypharmacy did not. There was heterogeneity between countries regarding how baseline factors were viewed.Despite training and guidance to individualize HbA1c goals, targets were still set in line with conventional values. A strong influence of country-specific guidelines on target setting was observed; confirming the importance of further education to implement new international guidelines in older adults.
机译:我们测试了在老年2型糖尿病患者的临床试验中设定个性化血糖目标和影响目标的因素的可行性。在七个欧洲地区的45个门诊中心进行了为期24周,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照的研究国家。招募了278名未接受过药物治疗或控制不充分(平均HbA1c为7.9%),年龄≥70岁,HbA1c水平≥7.0%和≤10.0%的2型糖尿病患者。研究者定义的个体化HbA1c目标以及基线特征对个体化治疗目标的影响进行评估,平均个体化HbA1c目标设定为7.0%。基线时的HbA1c预测了目标设定,使得HbA1c越高,目标就越具有侵略性(P <0.001)。与女性相比,男性更有可能被设定为攻击性目标(P = 0.026)。患者的虚弱状态呈显着趋势(P = 0.068),而糖尿病病程,年龄或综合性药物则没有。各国在如何看待基线因素方面存在异质性。尽管有针对个人的HbA1c目标的培训和指导,但目标仍然与常规值一致。观察到特定国家准则对目标设定有很大影响;确认继续教育对老年人实施新的国际准则的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号