首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AJP Reports >Pilot Study of Intra-Aortic Balloon Occlusion to Limit Morbidity in Patients with Adherent Placentation Undergoing Cesarean Hysterectomy
【2h】

Pilot Study of Intra-Aortic Balloon Occlusion to Limit Morbidity in Patients with Adherent Placentation Undergoing Cesarean Hysterectomy

机译:剖宫产子宫全切术患者主动脉球囊闭塞以限制发病率的初步研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective  We study whether using an intra-aortic balloon (IAB) during cesarean hysterectomy decreases delivery morbidity in patients with suspected morbidly adherent placentation. >Study Design  This is a retrospective cohort study of deliveries complicated by suspected abnormal placentation between 2009 and 2016 comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes with an IAB placed prior to cesarean hysterectomy versus no IAB. The primary outcome included quantified blood loss (QBL). >Results  Thirty-five cases were reviewed, 16 with IAB and 19 without IAB. No difference was seen in median QBL between the two groups (1,351 vs. 1,397 mL; p  = 0.90). There were no significant differences in overall surgical complications (19% IAB, 21% no IAB; p  = 0.86), bladder complications (12 vs. 21%; p  = 0.66), intensive care unit admissions (12 vs. 26%; p  = 0.41), surgical duration (2.9 vs. 2.8 hour;p = 0.83), or blood transfusions (median 2 vs. 2;p = 0.27) between the two groups. There was one groin hematoma at the balloon site that was managed conservatively. There were no complications involving thrombosis or limb ischemia in the IAB group.>Conclusion While we did not detect statistically significant differences, larger studies may be warranted given the potential for extreme morbidity in these cases. This study highlights the potential use of an IAB in the management of these cases.
机译:>目的我们研究了在剖宫产子宫切除术中使用主动脉内球囊(IAB)能否降低疑似病态粘附胎盘植入患者的分娩发病率。 >研究设计这是一项回顾性队列研究,比较了2009年至2016年间并发疑似胎盘异常的分娩并比较了剖宫产子宫切除术与无IAB放置IAB的孕妇和新生儿结局。主要结局包括量化失血量(QBL)。 >结果共检查了35例病例,其中16例患有IAB,19例未患有IAB。两组之间的中位QBL无差异(1351对1,397 mL; p = 0.90)。在总体外科手术并发症(IAB为19%,无IAB为21%; p = 0.86),膀胱并发症(12 vs. 21%; p = 0.66),重症监护病房入院(12 vs. 26%; p)方面无显着差异。 = 0.41),手术时间(2.9 vs. 2.8小时;p= 0.83)或输血(中位数2比2;p= 0.27)。气囊部位有一个腹股沟血肿,保守治疗。 IAB组无并发症,无血栓形成或肢体缺血。>结论尽管我们没有发现统计学上的显着差异,但鉴于这些病例极有可能发病,因此可能需要进行更大的研究。这项研究强调了IAB在处理这些病例中的潜在用途。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号