首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging >Head and neck PET/CT therapy response interpretation criteria (Hopkins criteria) - external validation study
【2h】

Head and neck PET/CT therapy response interpretation criteria (Hopkins criteria) - external validation study

机译:头颈PET / CT治疗反应解释标准(霍普金斯标准)-外部验证研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Qualitative assessment of PET/CT results in post therapy is very important to provide a reproducible and systemic reporting. A recently introduced response criteria, known as the Hopkins criteria showed promising results. Our aim is to externally validate the Hopkins interpretation system to assess therapy response in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). The study included 69 biopsy proven HNSCC patients who underwent post therapy PET/CT between 5-24 weeks after completion of therapy. PET/CT images were interpreted by one nuclear medicine physician and one nuclear radiologist, independently. The studies were scored according to the Hopkins criteria for right neck, left neck, primary tumor site, and overall assessment. Scores 1, 2, 3 were considered as negative and scores 4 and 5 were considered as positive for tumors. Inter-reader variability was assessed using percent agreement and Kappa statistics. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Of the 69 patients, 59 (85.5%) were males, with a mean age of 62.8 years. The percent agreement between readers for overall, right neck, left neck, and primary tumor site were 91.3%, 97.6%, 97.6%, 91.3% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the overall therapy assessment were 66.7%, 87.3%, 33%, 96.5% respectively. Cox univariate regression analysis showed positive primary tumor site scores and overall scores were associated with a higher risk of progression (p<0.05). External validation of Hopkins criteria showed excellent inter-reader agreement and prediction of PFS in HNSCC patients.
机译:对治疗后PET / CT结果的定性评估对于提供可重复和系统的报告非常重要。最近引入的响应标准(称为霍普金斯标准)显示出令人鼓舞的结果。我们的目标是从外部验证Hopkins解释系统,以评估头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)的治疗反应。该研究包括69名经活检证实的HNSCC患者,他们在治疗完成后的5至24周内接受了PET / CT治疗。一名核医学医师和一名核放射医师分别对PET / CT图像进行解释。研究根据霍普金斯大学对右颈,左颈,原发肿瘤部位和总体评估的标准进行评分。肿瘤的评分1、2、3被视为阴性,评分4和5被视为阳性。使用百分比一致性和Kappa统计数据评估阅读者之间的差异。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估算无进展生存期(PFS),并使用Cox比例风险回归进行分析。在这69名患者中,有59名(85.5%)是男性,平均年龄为62.8岁。读者对总体,右颈部,左颈部和原发性肿瘤部位的一致百分率分别为91.3%,97.6%,97.6%,91.3%。总体治疗评估的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为66.7%,87.3%,33%,96.5%。 Cox单变量回归分析显示原发肿瘤部位评分为阳性,总评分与进展风险较高相关(p <0.05)。霍普金斯标准的外部验证显示,HNSCC患者具有良好的读者间一致性和对PFS的预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号