首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education >Development and Validation of a Polypharmacy Knowledge Assessment Instrument
【2h】

Development and Validation of a Polypharmacy Knowledge Assessment Instrument

机译:多元药学知识评估工具的开发和验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective. To develop a brief instrument for academic pharmacists or physicians to use in assessing postgraduate residents’ knowledge of polypharmacy.>Methods. Five clinicians used a modified Delphi process to create a 26-item multiple-choice test to assess knowledge of polypharmacy in geriatric primary care. The test was distributed to 74 participants: 37 internal medicine (MD) residents, six nurse practitioner (NP) residents, nine primary care attendings, 12 pharmacists and pharmacy residents, and 10 geriatrics attendings and fellows. Construct validity was assessed using factor analysis and item response theory. Overall group differences were examined using a Kruskal-Wallis test, and between group differences were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.>Results. The response rate for the survey was 89%. Factor analysis resulted in a one factor solution. Item response theory modeling yielded a 12-item and six-item test. For the 12-item test, the mean scores of geriatricians and pharmacists (88%) were higher than those of MD and NP residents (58%) and primary care attendings (61%). No differences were found between MD and NP residents and primary care attendings. Findings for the six-item test were similar.>Conclusion. Both the 12-item and six-item versions of this polypharmacy test showed acceptable internal consistency and known groups validity and could be used in other academic settings. The similar scores between MD and NP residents and primary care attendings, which were significantly lower than scores for pharmacists and geriatricians, support the need for increased educational interventions.
机译:>目标。为学术药剂师或医师开发一种简短的工具,用于评估研究生对居民的多元药学知识。>方法。五名临床医生使用改进的Delphi程序创建了一个26项目多项选择测试,以评估老年初级保健中多药店的知识。该测试已分发给74位参与者:37位内科(MD)居民,6位护士(NP)居民,9位初级保健医生,12位药剂师和药房居民以及10位老年医学医生和研究员。使用因素分析和项目响应理论评估构建的有效性。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验检查总体总体差异,使用Wilcoxon秩和检验评估组之间的差异。>结果。。调查的答复率为89%。因素分析得出了一个单因素解决方案。项目响应理论建模产生了12个项目和6个项目的测试。对于12个项目的测试,老年医生和药剂师的平均分数(88%)高于MD和NP居民(58%)和初级保健就诊者(61%)。 MD和NP居民与初级保健就诊者之间未发现差异。六项测试的结果相似。>结论。该多药房测试的十二项和六项版本均显示出可接受的内部一致性和已知的组有效性,并且可以在其他学术环境中使用。 MD和NP居民与初级保健就诊者之间的得分相近,远低于药剂师和老年医师的得分,这表明需要增加教育干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号