首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings >Validation of an Electronic System for Recording Medical Student Patient Encounters
【2h】

Validation of an Electronic System for Recording Medical Student Patient Encounters

机译:记录医学生患者遭遇事件的电子系统的验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Liaison Committee for Medical Education requires monitoring of the students’ clinical experiences. Student logs, typically used for this purpose, have a number of limitations. We used an electronic system called Patient Tracker to passively generate student encounter data. The data contained in Patient Tracker was compared to the information reported on student logs and data abstracted from the patients’ charts. Patient Tracker identified 30% more encounters than the student logs. Compared to the student logs, Patient Tracker contained a higher average number of diagnoses per encounter (2.28 vs. 1.03, p<0.01). The diagnostic data contained in Patient Tracker was also more accurate under 4 different definitions of accuracy. Only 1.3% (9/677) of diagnoses in Patient Tracker vs. 16.9% (102/601) diagnoses in the logs could not be validated in patients’ charts (p<0.01). Patient Tracker is a more effective and accurate tool for documenting student clinical encounters than the conventional student logs.
机译:医学教育联络委员会要求监视学生的临床经验。通常用于此目的的学生日志有很多限制。我们使用了一个名为Patient Tracker的电子系统来被动生成学生遭遇数据。将Patient Tracker中包含的数据与学生日志中报告的信息以及从患者图表中提取的数据进行了比较。患者追踪器发现的遭遇比学生日志多30%。与学生日志相比,Patient Tracker每次遇到的平均诊断次数更高(2.28对1.03,p <0.01)。在4种不同的准确度定义下,Patient Tracker中包含的诊断数据也更加准确。患者追踪器中只有1.3%(9/677)的诊断与日志中16.9%(102/601)的诊断在患者图表中无法得到验证(p <0.01)。与传统的学生日志相比,Patient Tracker是记录学生临床遭遇的更有效,更准确的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号