首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings >Assessing the implementation process.
【2h】

Assessing the implementation process.

机译:评估实施过程。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS) has many benefits and could improve health care outcomes. Reaping these benefits, however, is dependent on successful implementation of a provider order entry system. The literature supports substantial evidence that even systems that are usable, effective and reliable have not been adopted by the intended users. A successful implementation may be substantially a function of the degree to which the processes of care have changed to adapt to the new system. To ensure successful implementation we suggest monitoring the implementation process itself. The purpose of this paper is to report the methodology we developed for assessing how successfully a provider order entry system is being implemented. We adopt a model of diffusion of information technology developed by Fichman (1994) and expanded by Ash (1997). In this model, diffusion is characterized be three categories, "breadth" (infusion) and "depth" (diffusion) and "quality" (appropriateness of use). In this paper we discuss the typology of diffusion and describe specific measures designed to measure infusion and diffusion of a hospital information system.
机译:电脑病人记录系统(CPRS)有很多好处,并且可以改善医疗保健效果。但是,要获得这些好处,取决于提供者订单输入系统的成功实施。文献支持大量证据,证明即使是可用的,有效的和可靠的系统也没有被目标用户采用。成功的实施可能基本上取决于护理过程已更改为适应新系统的程度。为了确保成功实施,我们建议监视实施过程本身。本文的目的是报告我们开发的用于评估供应商订单输入系统成功实施方式的方法。我们采用由Fichman(1994)开发并由Ash(1997)扩展的信息技术扩散模型。在此模型中,扩散的特征可分为三类:“宽度”(注入)和“深度”(扩散)以及“质量”(适当使用)。在本文中,我们讨论了扩散的类型,并描述了旨在测量医院信息系统的注入和扩散的特定措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号