首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ambio >The Regional Advisory Councils: What is Their Potential to Incorporate Stakeholder Knowledge into Fisheries Governance?
【2h】

The Regional Advisory Councils: What is Their Potential to Incorporate Stakeholder Knowledge into Fisheries Governance?

机译:区域咨询委员会:将利益相关者的知识纳入渔业治理的潜力是什么?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The protection of the Baltic Sea ecosystem is exacerbated by the social, environmental and economic complexities of governing European fisheries. Increased stakeholder participation and knowledge integration are suggested to improve the EU’s Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), suffering from legitimacy, credibility and compliance problems. As a result, the CFP was revised in 2002 to involve fisheries representatives, NGOs and other stakeholders through so called Regional Advisory Councils (RACs) in the policy process. We address the RAC’s task to incorporate stakeholder knowledge into the EU’s fisheries governance system in empirical and theoretical perspectives. Drawing on a four-stage governance concept we subsequently suggest that a basic problem is a mismatch between participation purpose (knowledge inclusion) and the governance stage at which RACs are formally positioned (evaluation of management proposals). We conclude that, if the aim is to broaden the knowledge base of fisheries management, stakeholders need to be included earlier in the governance process.
机译:欧洲渔业管理的社会,环境和经济复杂性加剧了波罗的海生态系统的保护。建议增加利益相关者的参与和知识整合,以改善遭受合法性,信誉和合规性问题困扰的欧盟共同渔业政策(CFP)。结果,2002年对CFP进行了修订,使渔业代表,非政府组织和其他利益相关者通过所谓的地区咨询委员会(RAC)参与政策制定过程。我们处理RAC的任务,即从经验和理论角度将利益相关者的知识纳入欧盟的渔业治理体系。随后,我们从四个阶段的治理概念出发,提出一个基本问题是参与目的(知识包含)与RAC正式定位的治理阶段(管理建议评估)之间不匹配。我们得出的结论是,如果目标是扩大渔业管理的知识基础,则需要在治理过程中尽早包括利益相关方。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号