首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Family Medicine >Feasibility and Diagnostic Validity of the M-3 Checklist: A Brief Self-Rated Screen for Depressive Bipolar Anxiety and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders in Primary Care
【2h】

Feasibility and Diagnostic Validity of the M-3 Checklist: A Brief Self-Rated Screen for Depressive Bipolar Anxiety and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders in Primary Care

机译:M-3检查表的可行性和诊断有效性:初级保健中抑郁双相焦虑和创伤后应激障碍的简短自我评级筛查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>PURPOSE Mood and anxiety disorders are the most common psychiatric conditions seen in primary care, yet they remain underdetected and undertreated. Screening tools can improve detection, but available instruments are limited by the number of disorders assessed. We wanted to assess the feasibility and diagnostic validity of the My Mood Monitor (M-3) checklist, a new, 1-page, patient-rated, 27-item tool developed to screen for multiple psychiatric disorders in primary care.>METHODS We enrolled a sample of 647 consecutive participants aged 18 years and older who were seeking primary care at an academic family medicine clinic between July 2007 and February 2008. We used a 2-step scoring procedure to make screening more efficient. The main outcomes measured were the sensitivity and specificity of the M-3 for major depression, bipolar disorder, any anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a specific type of anxiety disorder. Using a split sample technique, analysis proceeded from determination of optimal screening thresholds to assessment of the psychometric properties of the self-report instrument using the determined thresholds. We used the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview as the diagnostic standard. Feasibility was assessed with patient and physician exit questionnaires.>RESULTS The depression module had a sensitivity of 0.84 and a specificity of 0.80. The bipolar module had a sensitivity of 0.88, and a specificity of 0.70. The anxiety module had a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.78, and the PTSD module had a sensitivity of 0.88 and a specificity of 0.76. As a screen for any psychiatric disorder, sensitivity was 0.83 and specificity was 0.76. Patients took less than 5 minutes to complete the M-3 in the waiting room, and less than 1% reported not having time to complete it. Eighty-three percent of clinicians reviewed the checklist in 30 or fewer seconds, and 80% thought it was helpful in reviewing patients’ emotional health.>CONCLUSIONS The M-3 demonstrates utility as a valid, efficient, and feasible tool for screening multiple common psychiatric illnesses, including bipolar disorder and PTSD, in primary care. Its diagnostic accuracy equals that of currently used single-disorder screens and has the additional benefit of being combined into a 1-page tool. The M-3 potentially can reduce missed psychiatric diagnoses and facilitate proper treatment of identified cases.
机译:>目的情绪和焦虑症是基层医疗中最常见的精神疾病,但仍然未被发现和治疗不足。筛查工具可以改善检测,但可用的仪器受到评估的疾病数量的限制。我们想评估My Mood Monitor(M-3)清单的可行性和诊断有效性,该清单是一种新的,一页纸,按患者评分的27个项目,旨在筛查初级保健中的多种精神疾病。>方法我们收集了2007年7月至2008年2月间在一家学术家庭医学诊所寻求初级保健的647名18岁及以上的连续参与者的样本。我们采用了两步评分程序,以提高筛查的效率。所测量的主要结果是M-3对重度抑郁症,躁郁症,任何焦虑症和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)(一种特殊类型的焦虑症)的敏感性和特异性。使用拆分样本技术,分析从确定最佳筛查阈值开始,到使用确定的阈值评估自我报告工具的心理测量特性。我们使用迷你国际神经精神病学访谈作为诊断标准。通过患者和医生退出问卷评估可行性。>结果抑郁症模块的敏感性为0.84,特异性为0.80。双极模块的灵敏度为0.88,特异性为0.70。焦虑模块的灵敏度为0.82,特异性为0.78,而PTSD模块的灵敏度为0.88,特异性为0.76。作为对任何精神疾病的筛查,敏感性为0.83,特异性为0.76。患者在候诊室花费不到5分钟的时间完成了M-3,不到1%的人报告没有时间完成它。 83%的临床医生在30秒或更短的时间内检查了清单,而80%的人认为这有助于检查患者的情绪健康。>结论 M-3证明了其是有效,高效且实用的工具。在初级保健中筛查多种常见精神病(包括躁郁症和PTSD)的可行工具。它的诊断准确度与当前使用的单混乱屏幕相同,并且具有组合成1页工具的其他好处。 M-3可能会减少错过的精神病学诊断并促进对已确诊病例的正确治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号