首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Family Medicine >Guidelines for the Primary Care of Lesbian Gay and Bisexual People: A Systematic Review
【2h】

Guidelines for the Primary Care of Lesbian Gay and Bisexual People: A Systematic Review

机译:女同性恋男同性恋和双性恋者基本医疗保健指南:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>PURPOSE We assessed whether existing guidelines for the primary care of lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people meet appropriate standards of developmental rigor, and whether they provide consistent recommendations useful for primary care clinicians.>METHODS We performed a systematic review of such guidelines using the Cochrane Collaboration method. The countries searched were Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States. For sources, we used electronic databases, guidelines databases, primary care professional organizations, government departments of public health, LGB health care textbooks, and national LGB organizations. We assessed the quality of existing guidelines using the validated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument and compared the recommendations from all fully appraised guidelines.>RESULTS Our search did not identify any previous systematic reviews on primary care of LGB people. Of 2,421 documents identified, we initially reviewed 30 and fully appraised 11, none of which completely satisfied the AGREE criteria for quality and only 2 of which were specifically designed for primary care. Developmental rigor was poor. Particular gaps were a lack of explicit inclusion criteria, independent reviewers, and updating procedures. Nonetheless, we did identify several consistent recommendations pertinent to primary care settings: guidance on inclusive clinical environments, standards for clinician-patient communication, sensitive documentation of sexual orientation, knowledge for cultural awareness, staff training, and addressing population health issues.>CONCLUSIONS Currently available guidelines for LGB care are philosophically and practically consistent, and provide a degree of evidence-based clinical and systems support to primary care clinicians. There is a need, however, for evidence-based LGB guidelines that are more rigorously developed, disseminated, and evaluated specifically for the primary care setting.
机译:>目的我们评估了现有的男女同性恋,双性恋和双性恋(LGB)初级保健指南是否符合适当的发展严格标准,以及它们是否提供了对初级保健临床医生有用的一致建议。>方法我们使用Cochrane协作方法对此类指南进行了系统的回顾。搜索的国家是澳大利亚,加拿大,爱尔兰,新西兰,英国和美国。对于来源,我们使用了电子数据库,指南数据库,初级保健专业组织,政府公共卫生部门,LGB保健教科书和全国性LGB组织。我们使用经过验证的《研究与评估指南评估》(AGREE)工具评估了现有指南的质量,并比较了所有经过充分评估的指南中的建议。>结果 LGB人的照顾。在确定的2,421份文件中,我们最初审查了30份并进行了全面评估,但没有一份文件完全满足AGREE的质量标准,只有2份是专门为初级保健设计的。发展严谨性很差。特别的差距是缺乏明确的纳入标准,缺乏独立的审阅者和更新程序。尽管如此,我们确实确定了与基层医疗机构有关的几项一致建议:关于包容性临床环境的指南,临床医生与患者沟通的标准,敏感的性取向文件,文化意识知识,员工培训以及解决人口健康问题。>结论当前,有关LGB护理的指南在哲学上和实践上都是一致的,并且为初级护理临床医生提供了一定程度的循证临床和系统支持。但是,需要基于证据的LGB指南,这些指南应针对基础医疗机构进行更加严格的开发,传播和评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号