首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Anesthesia Progress >Comparative Efficacy of 2 Topical Anesthetics for the Placement of Orthodontic Temporary Anchorage Devices
【2h】

Comparative Efficacy of 2 Topical Anesthetics for the Placement of Orthodontic Temporary Anchorage Devices

机译:2种局部麻醉药对正畸型临时固定装置放置的比较功效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study compared the effectiveness of topical benzocaine 20% versus a combination of lidocaine, tetracaine, and phenylephrine in providing sufficient analgesia for the placement of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices (TADs). The 2 topical anesthetics were tested against each other bilaterally using a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. The agents were left in place for the amount of time prescribed by the manufacturer. The TAD was then placed, and each subject rated the degree of pain on a Heft-Parker visual analogue scale. A pulse oximeter was used to record the preoperative and postoperative pulse rates. Statistically significant differences in perceived pain (P < .05) and success rate (P < .01) between drugs were seen, but no significant difference in pulse rate change between the topical anesthetics was observed (P > .05). It was concluded that when the efficacy of topical benzocaine and of a combination product was compared as the sole anesthetic to facilitate acceptable pain control for placement of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices, the combination product was considerably more efficacious.
机译:这项研究比较了局部使用20%苯佐卡因与利多卡因,丁卡因和去氧肾上腺素的组合在提供足够的镇痛作用以放置正畸临时锚固装置(TAD)方面的有效性。使用随机,双盲,交叉设计,对两种局部麻醉药进行了双边相对测试。将代理商放置在制造商规定的时间内。然后放置TAD,并且每个受试者以Heft-Parker视觉模拟量表对疼痛程度进行评估。使用脉搏血氧仪记录术前和术后的脉搏率。观察到药物之间的感知疼痛(P <.05)和成功率(P <.01)有统计学意义的差异,但是在局部麻醉药之间未观察到脉搏率变化的显着差异(P> .05)。结论是,当将局部苯佐卡因和组合产品的功效作为唯一的麻醉剂进行比较以促进可接受的疼痛控制以放置正畸临时固定装置时,组合产品的功效明显更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号