首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the National Medical Association >Responses to reprint requests: form letters versus preprinted cards.
【2h】

Responses to reprint requests: form letters versus preprinted cards.

机译:对重印请求的响应:套用信函与预印卡片。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Nine hundred ninety-four reprint requests were made for almost all the original articles that appeared in five pediatric journals between August and October in 1985, 1986, and 1987. Half of the reprint requests were made with form letters and the other half with preprinted cards. A total of 636 (64%) reprints were received within 6 months of mailing the request. The return rates for reprints solicited by form letters and preprinted cards were 68% and 60%, respectively. The response to reprint requests was greater for more recent articles. The number of articles that came in the form of photocopies was directly proportional to the time interval between the publication and the reprint request. Forty-one requests (4.1%) were returned by the authors because their reprint supply was exhausted. Thirty-eight requests (3.8%) were returned undelivered. We conclude that letter requests solicit a slightly better response than card requests and that the response is greater for more recent articles.
机译:对1985年1986年至1987年8月至10月间出现在五本儿科期刊上的几乎所有原始文章提出了949次重印请求。重印请求中有一半是用套用信函提出的,另一半是用预印卡片提出的。在寄出要求后的6个月内,共收到636(64%)份转载。通过套用信函和预印卡索取的再版的退货率分别为68%和60%。对于较新的文章,对重印请求的响应更大。以影印本形式出现的文章数量与出版和重印请求之间的时间间隔成正比。作者返回了41项请求(占4.1%),因为他们的转载已用完。 38个请求(3.8%)未送回。我们得出的结论是,信函请求比卡片请求引起的响应要好一些,而对于较新的文章,响应会更大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号