首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine / Annual Scientific Conference >Injury Potential at Center Rear Seating Positions in Rear-Facing Child Restraint Systems in Side Impacts
【2h】

Injury Potential at Center Rear Seating Positions in Rear-Facing Child Restraint Systems in Side Impacts

机译:侧面碰撞的后向约束儿童系统中中央后座位置的伤害潜力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Head injuries occur to occupants of rear-facing child restraint systems in side impacts. This study examined the head injury potential of center-seated occupants using sled tests at change in velocities of 35, 29 and 24 km/h. Other parameters included combinations of with and without a simulated door. A twelve-month-old child dummy was used in combination, convertible and infant rear-facing child restraint systems. Head excursions and head injury criteria (HIC) were obtained. In 35 km/h tests without simulated door, head excursions ranged from 568 to 655 mm, exceeding the simulated door intrusion plane. HIC ranged from 87 to 157, below the 390 limit. At this velocity but with the simulated door, HIC ranged from 804 to 1297. Head excursions ranged from 424 to 480 mm. In 29 and 24 km/h tests, the dummy and child restraint system impacted the simulated door. HIC ranged from 275 to 604 and 141 to 314, and head excursions ranged from 388 to 470 mm and 365 to 460 mm, respectively. Far-side belt loads were 2.4–3.2 kN and 1.7–2.3 kN for the 35 km/h tests without and with the simulated door, and 1.5–2.1 kN and 1.0–1.6 kN for 29 and 24 km/h tests with the simulated door. These findings indicate that occupants in the center seating position in smaller/medium-size vehicles may impact an intruding door and sustain head injuries. A need exists for better protection/attachment methods for center positioned rear-facing child restraint systems to reduce the injury potential in side impacts at velocities greater than 29 km/h.
机译:面向后方的儿童约束系统的乘员在侧面碰撞时头部受伤。这项研究使用雪橇测试在35、29和24 km / h的速度变化下检查了中座乘客的头部受伤可能性。其他参数包括带和不带模拟门的组合。一个十二个月大的儿童假人被用于组合式,可转换式和婴儿后向儿童约束系统。获得了头部偏移和头部受伤标准(HIC)。在没有模拟门的35 km / h测试中,头部偏移范围为568至655 mm,超过了模拟门的侵入平面。 HIC的范围从87到157,低于390的限制。以该速度但使用模拟门,HIC的范围为804至1297。头部偏移范围为424至480 mm。在29和24 km / h的测试中,假人和儿童约束系统冲击了模拟门。 HIC的范围为275至604和141至314,头部偏移范围分别为388至470 mm和365至460 mm。对于不带模拟门和带模拟门的35 km / h测试,远侧皮带负载分别为2.4–3.2 kN和1.7–2.3 kN,对于具有模拟门的29和24 km / h测试,远侧皮带负载分别为1.5–2.1 kN和1.0–1.6 kN门。这些发现表明,较小/中型车辆的中央座位上的乘员可能会影响闯入的车门并造成头部受伤。存在对用于居中定位的面向后的儿童约束系统的更好的保护/附接方法的需求,以减少在大于29 km / h的速度的侧面碰撞中的潜在伤害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号