首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine / Annual Scientific Conference >How Many People Are Injured and Killed as a Result of Aging? Frailty Fragility and the Elderly Risk-Exposure Tradeoff Assessed via a Risk Saturation Model
【2h】

How Many People Are Injured and Killed as a Result of Aging? Frailty Fragility and the Elderly Risk-Exposure Tradeoff Assessed via a Risk Saturation Model

机译:有多少人因衰老而受伤和被杀?通过风险饱和度模型评估的脆弱性脆弱性和老年人的风险暴露权衡

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Crash protection for an aging population is one of the primary drivers of contemporary passive safety research, yet estimates of the potential benefit of age-optimized systems have not been reported. This study estimates the number killed and injured in traffic crashes due to the age-related reduction in tolerance to loading. A risk-saturation model is developed and calibrated using 2000–2007 data for the age distribution of crash-involved adult occupants and drivers and the number of those injured and killed in 2006. Nonlinear functions describing the relationships between age and risk, adjusted for several confounders are developed using 10 years of NASS-CDS data and considered along with published risk functions for both mortality and injury. The numbers killed and injured as a result of age-related fragility and frailty are determined by setting the risk at all ages equal to the risk at age 20 (i.e., risk is assumed to “saturate” at age 20). The analysis shows that risk saturation at age 20 corresponds to 7,805–14,939 fewer driver deaths and 10,989–21,132 fewer deaths to all occupants. Furthermore, 1.13–1.32 million fewer occupants would be injured (0.80–0.93 million fewer drivers) per year. In other words, that number of deaths and injuries can be attributed to age-related reductions in loading tolerance. As the age of risk saturation increases, the benefit decreases, but remains substantial even in the age regime typically considered “elderly”. For example, risk saturation at age 60 corresponds to 1,011–3,577 fewer deaths and 73,537–179,396 fewer injured occupants per year. The benefit of risk saturation is nearly log-linear up to approximately age 70, but drops off quickly thereafter due to the low exposures in the oldest age range. The key contribution of this study is the quantification of deaths and injuries that can be attributed to aging and the development of functions describing the relationship between age of risk saturation and the number of deaths and injuries averted.
机译:人口老龄化的碰撞保护是当代被动安全研究的主要驱动力之一,但尚未报告对年龄优化系统的潜在好处的估计。这项研究估计了由于年龄相关的耐力下降导致交通事故中死亡和受伤的人数。使用2000-2007年数据开发并校准了风险饱和度模型,用于涉及撞车的成年乘员和驾驶员的年龄分布以及2006年受伤和丧生的人数。非线性函数描述了年龄与风险之间的关系,并对其进行了调整混杂因素是使用10年的NASS-CDS数据开发的,并考虑了已发布的死亡和伤害风险函数。与年龄相关的脆弱性和脆弱性导致的死亡和受伤人数是通过将所有年龄段的风险设置为等于20岁时的风险来确定的(即,假定风险在20岁时“饱和”)。分析表明,在20岁时,所有乘员的风险饱和度减少了7,805–14,939驾驶员死亡,而死亡人数减少了10,989-21,132。此外,每年将受伤的乘客减少了1133-13.2百万(驾驶员减少了0.80-93万)。换句话说,死亡和受伤的数量可以归因于与年龄相关的负荷承受能力的下降。随着风险饱和年龄的增加,收益会降低,但即使在通常被认为是“老年人”的年龄制度中,收益仍然保持可观。例如,每年60岁时的风险饱和度对应的死亡人数减少了1,011–3,577,受伤的乘客减少了73,537–179,396。风险饱和的好处直到大约70岁时几乎是对数线性的,但是由于在最老的年龄段中暴露量较低,因此风险很快下降。这项研究的关键贡献是可以归因于衰老的死亡和伤害的量化,以及描述风险饱和年龄与避免的死亡和伤害数量之间关系的函数的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号