首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Translational Medicine >Cardiac physiology in post myocardial infarction patients: the effect of cardiac rehabilitation programs—a systematic review and update meta-analysis
【2h】

Cardiac physiology in post myocardial infarction patients: the effect of cardiac rehabilitation programs—a systematic review and update meta-analysis

机译:心肌梗死后患者的心脏生理:心脏康复计划的效果—系统评价和更新的荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cardiac rehabilitation program (CRP) is a recognized non-pharmacological modality to decrease mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) events. We aimed to evaluate the effect of CRP on the cardiac physiology in patients post myocardial infarction (MI). Online database search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, COCHRANE, and GOOGLE SCHOLAR were performed (1988–Mar 2016); key bibliographies were reviewed. Studies comparing post MI patients who were enrolled in a CRP to those who were not, were included. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) by random and fixed effects models of pooled data were calculated. Study quality was assessed using CONSORT criteria. Outcomes of interest measured included resting and maximum heart rate (HR), peak VO2, ejection fraction (EF%), wall motion score index (WMSI), left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) in cardiac rehabilitation patients versus control. Search strategy yielded 147 studies, 23 studies fulfilled the selection criteria, 19 of which were RCTs. These included a total of 1,683 patients; 827 were enrolled in a CRP while 855 did not receive the intervention. Median age was 58 years. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, comorbidities, severity of CAD, baseline EF or HR. Meta-analysis of data included demonstrated that CRP patients had lower post-intervention resting HR than non-CRP patients (SMD: −0.59; 95% CI: −0.73 to −0.46, fixed effect model P<0.05). EF% was significantly improved after CRP compared to control (SMD: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.40, P=0.03). Peak VO2 was significantly improved by CRP (SMD: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.45; P<0.0001). LVEDV was significantly less in CRP patients (SMD: −0.31; 95% CI: −0.59 to −0.02, fixed effect model P<0.05). WMSI was significantly less in CRP patients (SMD: −0.41; 95% CI: −0.78 to −0.05, P=0.024). CRP improves cardiac function in post MI patients. This may explain the reported improvement of functionality and mortality among those patients. Further randomized trials may help evaluate the long-term benefits of CRP.
机译:心脏康复计划(CRP)是一种公认​​的非药物疗法,可以降低急性心肌梗塞(AMI)事件后的死亡率。我们旨在评估CRP对心肌梗死(MI)患者心脏生理的影响。进行了PubMed,MEDLINE,EMBASE,SCOPUS,Cochrane和GOOGLE SCHOLAR的在线数据库搜索(1988年-2016年3月);审查了关键书目。纳入了将参加CRP的MI后患者与未参加CRP的患者进行比较的研究。通过汇集数据的随机和固定效应模型,计算了具有相应95%置信区间(CI)的标准均值差(SMD)。使用CONSORT标准评估研究质量。所测量的关注结果包括心脏康复患者与对照组相比的静息和最大心率(HR),峰值VO2,射血分数(EF%),壁运动得分指数(WMSI),左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV)。搜索策略产生了147项研究,其中23项符合选择标准,其中19项是RCT。其中包括1,683名患者; 827名参加了CRP,而855名没有接受干预。中位年龄为58岁。两组在年龄,合并症,CAD严重程度,基线EF或HR方面无显着差异。对数据的荟萃分析表明,CRP患者的干预后静息HR低于非CRP患者(SMD:-0.59; 95%CI:-0.73至-0.46,固定效应模型P <0.05)。与对照组相比,CRP后EF%明显改善(SMD:0.21; 95%CI:0.02至0.40,P = 0.03)。通过CRP可以显着改善VO2峰值(SMD:1.00; 95%CI:0.56至1.45; P <0.0001)。 CRP患者的LVEDV显着降低(SMD:-0.31; 95%CI:-0.59至-0.02,固定效应模型P <0.05)。 CRP患者的WMSI显着降低(SMD:-0.41; 95%CI:-0.78至-0.05,P = 0.024)。 CRP可改善MI后患者的心脏功能。这可能解释了这些患者中功能和死亡率的改善。进一步的随机试验可能有助于评估CRP的长期益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号