首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Translational Medicine >Seven times replacement of permanent cardiac pacemaker in 33 years to maintain adequate heart rate: a case report
【2h】

Seven times replacement of permanent cardiac pacemaker in 33 years to maintain adequate heart rate: a case report

机译:33年内七次更换永久性心脏起搏器以维持足够的心率:一例病例报告

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Over the past few decades, recent developments in pacemaker technology from fixed-rate single-chamber pacemakers to dual chamber pacemakers with pacing algorithms have changed the therapeutic landscape resulting in better healthcare outcomes by improving rate response with minimal ventricular pacing. Here, we share our longest clinical experience with an elderly Chinese male patient who was diagnosed with third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block and was admitted in our hospital 33 years ago. An 85-year-old male patient from China was hospitalized due to dizziness and syncope, with an initial diagnosis revealing third-degree AV block with a heart rate of 35–40 beats per minute (bpm) along with Aase’s syndrome and primary hypertension. A single-chamber pacemaker (VVI) was implanted immediately giving the patient symptomatic relief. However, 5-year post-surgery VVI was replaced due to battery exhaustion, while the primary electrode catheter was kept in use. Few years later, the patient again complained of dizziness and re-examination revealed VVI battery debilitation due to premature battery exhaustion. Single-chamber pacemaker was again implanted via the same position of right upper chest. However, after adjusting the frequency of stimulation of the pacemaker to 70 bpm, patient had a symptomatic relief. Considering the severity of patient’s disease and knowing that cardiac dysfunction was reported previously, a tri-chamber pacemaker was chosen to take place of previous single-chamber pacemaker. For 33 years, the patient underwent 7 times replacement of pacemaker for battery exhaustion or inadequacy. We successfully performed overall seven pacemaker implantations and upgradation in an elderly Chinese patient diagnosed with third-degree AV block for 33 years. A long following up till now demonstrated no major complications with normal heart rate functioning.
机译:在过去的几十年中,起搏器技术的最新发展,从固定速率的单腔起搏器到带有起搏算法的双腔起搏器,已经改变了治疗领域,通过以最小的心室起搏改善速率响应,从而改善了医疗效果。在这里,我们与一位中国老年男性患者分享我们最长的临床经验,该患者被诊断患有三级房室传导阻滞并于33年前入院。一名来自中国的85岁男性患者因头晕和晕厥而入院,初步诊断为三度房室传导阻滞,心律为每分钟35-40次搏动(bpm)以及Aase综合征和原发性高血压。立即植入单腔起搏器(VVI),使患者症状缓解。但是,由于电池电量耗尽,已更换了手术后5年的VVI,而主电极导管仍在使用中。几年后,患者再次抱怨头昏眼花,重新检查后发现电池过早耗尽导致VVI电池虚弱。通过右上胸部的相同位置再次植入单腔起搏器。但是,在将起搏器的刺激频率调整为70 bpm之后,患者出现了症状缓解。考虑到患者疾病的严重程度,并且知道以前曾报告过心脏功能障碍,因此选择了三腔起搏器代替以前的单腔起搏器。 33年中,该患者经历了7次更换起搏器的手术,以检查电池是否耗尽或电量不足。我们成功地对一名诊断为三度房室传导阻滞的中国老年患者进行了七次起搏器植入和升级手术,历时33年。迄今为止的长期随访未显示心律正常的主要并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号