首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy >Toxic Profile of Benznidazole in Patients with Chronic Chagas Disease: Risk Factors and Comparison of the Product from Two Different Manufacturers
【2h】

Toxic Profile of Benznidazole in Patients with Chronic Chagas Disease: Risk Factors and Comparison of the Product from Two Different Manufacturers

机译:苯并硝唑在慢性恰加斯病患者中的毒性特征:危险因素和两个不同制造商产品的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Benznidazole is considered the first-line treatment option against Chagas disease. The major drawback of benznidazole is its toxicity profile. The main objectives of this study were to describe the adverse events (AEs) in patients with chronic Chagas disease treated with benznidazole, determine the risk factors involved and compare the toxic profiles of two different preparations of the drug from ELEA and Roche. A total of 746 patients were diagnosed with Chagas disease in a 5-year period, and of these 472 were treated with benznidazole. A high proportion of patients (n = 360 [76%]) suffered AEs, the most frequent being those related to hypersensitivity (52.9% of patients), headache (12.5%), and epigastric pain (10.4%). In 72 (12.7%) cases, treatment was discontinued. Overall, women had a higher incidence of AEs compared to men (81.3% versus 66%, P = 0.001) and were subject to higher levels of hypersensitivity-related events. Dermatological events, digestive tract manifestations, and general symptoms had a greater likelihood to appear around day 10 and neurological AEs around day 40 after starting treatment. With respect to liver function and hematological tests, the majority of patients did not suffer significant perturbation of liver enzymes or altered blood cell counts. However, 14 patients suffered from neutropenia, and 14 patients had aminotransferase levels that were more than four times the upper limit of the normal range. Patients treated with the ELEA benznidazole product experienced more arthromyalgia, neutropenia, and neurological disorders (mainly paresthesias) than those treated with the Roche product. Both drug products resulted in approximately the same percentage of permanent withdrawals.
机译:苯硝唑被认为是抗南美锥虫病的一线治疗选择。苯硝唑的主要缺点是其毒性。这项研究的主要目的是描述用苯硝唑治疗的慢性Chagas病患者的不良事件(AE),确定涉及的危险因素,并比较两种不同的ELEA和Roche药物制剂的毒性特征。在5年中,总共746例患者被诊断出患有Chagas病,其中472例接受了苯硝唑治疗。很大一部分患者(n = 360 [76%])患有AE,最常见的是与超敏反应(占52.9%的患者),头痛(12.5%)和上腹痛(10.4%)相关的事件。在72(12.7%)例中,治疗被中止。总体而言,与男性相比,女性的AE发生率更高(81.3%对66%,P = 0.001),并且发生与超敏反应相关的事件的水平更高。开始治疗后第10天左右出现皮肤病,消化道表现和一般症状的可能性更大,第40天左右出现神经学不良事件。关于肝功能和血液学检查,大多数患者并未遭受肝酶的显着扰动或血细胞计数改变。但是,有14例患有中性粒细胞减少症,而14例患者的转氨酶水平是正常范围上限的四倍以上。与使用Roche产品治疗的患者相比,使用ELEA苯硝唑产品治疗的患者经历了更多的关节痛,中性粒细胞减少和神经系统疾病(主要是感觉异常)。两种药品都导致永久性撤药的百分比大致相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号