首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy >Pharmacodynamics of Moxifloxacin against Anaerobes Studied in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic Model
【2h】

Pharmacodynamics of Moxifloxacin against Anaerobes Studied in an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic Model

机译:在体外药代动力学模型中研究莫西沙星对厌氧菌的药效学

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The antibacterial effects of moxifloxacin against Bacteroides fragilis, Clostridium perfringens, and gram-positive anaerobic cocci (GPAC) were studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model. Initially, a dose-ranging study with area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratios of 6.7 to 890 was used to investigate the effect of anaerobic conditions on the AUC/MIC antibacterial effect (ABE) relationship with Escherichia coli. The AUC/MIC ratios for 50% and 90% effects, using a log CFU drop at 24 h as the antibacterial effect measure, were 34 and 59, respectively, aerobic and 54 and 96, respectively, anaerobic. These values are not significantly different. Dose ranging at AUC/MIC ratios of 9 to 216 against the anaerobes indicated a differing AUC/MIC ABE pattern, and the AUC/MICs for 50% and 90% effects were lower: for B. fragilis, they were 10.5 and 25.7, respectively; for C. perfringens, they were 8.6 and 16.2; and for GPAC, they were 7.3 and 17.4. The maximum-effect log drops were as follows: for B. fragilis, −3.2 ± 0.2 logs; for C. perfringens, −3.7 ± 0.1 logs; and for GPAC, −2.5 ± 0.1 logs. Although the anaerobes were not eradicated, there was no emergence of resistance. Comparison of the ABE of moxifloxacin to that of ertapenem against B. fragilis indicated that moxifloxacin was superior at 24 h and 48 h. In contrast, ertapenem was superior to moxifloxacin against GPAC at 24 h and 48 h and against C. perfringens at 48 h. Both drugs performed equivalently against C. perfringens at 24 h. Monte Carlo simulations using human serum AUC data and an AUC/MIC anaerobe target of 7.5 suggests a >90% target achievement at MICs of <2 mg/liter. This divides the B. fragilis wild-type MIC distribution. The pharmacodynamic properties of moxifloxacin against anaerobes are different than those against aerobic species. The clinical implications of these differences need further exploration.
机译:在体外药代动力学模型中研究了莫西沙星对脆弱拟杆菌,产气荚膜梭状芽胞杆菌和革兰氏阳性厌氧球菌(GPAC)的抗菌作用。最初,使用浓度时间曲线(AUC)/ MIC比在6.7至890下的面积进行剂量范围研究,以研究厌氧条件对AUC / MIC抗菌作用(ABE)与大肠杆菌之间关系的影响。 50%和90%效果的AUC / MIC比(使用24小时对数CFU下降作为抗菌效果度量)分别为34和59(需氧)和54和96(厌氧)。这些值没有显着差异。相对于厌氧菌,AUC / MIC比为9到216的剂量范围显示出不同的AUC / MIC ABE模式,并且对50%和90%效果的AUC / MIC较低:对于脆弱芽孢杆菌,分别为10.5和25.7。 ;对于产气荚膜梭菌,分别为8.6和16.2;对于GPAC,分别为7.3和17.4。最大影响对数下降如下:对于脆弱芽孢杆菌,为-3.2±0.2个对数;对于产气荚膜梭菌,-3.7±0.1 log对于GPAC,为-2.5±0.1 log。尽管没有消除厌氧菌,但没有出现抗药性。比较莫西沙星与厄他培南对脆弱类芽孢杆菌的ABE,表明莫西沙星在24 h和48 h表现更好。相反,厄他培南在24 h和48 h时对GPAC优于莫西沙星,在48 h时对产气荚膜梭状芽孢杆菌的作用优于莫西沙星。两种药物在24 h时对产气荚膜梭菌均等效。使用人类血清AUC数据和7.5的AUC / MIC厌氧菌目标值进行的蒙特卡罗模拟表明,在MIC小于2 mg / L时,目标实现了> 90%。这划分了脆弱脆弱芽孢杆菌的野生型MIC分布。莫西沙星对厌氧菌的药效特性与对需氧菌种的药效特性不同。这些差异的临床意义需要进一步探索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号