首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy >Effects of an Antibiotic Cycling Program on Antibiotic Prescribing Practices in an Intensive Care Unit
【2h】

Effects of an Antibiotic Cycling Program on Antibiotic Prescribing Practices in an Intensive Care Unit

机译:抗生素循环程序对重症监护室抗生素处方操作的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Various interventions have been proposed to combat the increase of antibiotic resistance and influence antibiotic prescribing practices. A prospective cohort study in a medical intensive care unit was conducted to determine the effect of an antibiotic cycling program on patterns of antibiotic use and to determine patient factors associated with cycling adherence. Four major classes of antibiotics for empirical therapy of suspected gram-negative bacterial infections were rotated at 3- and 4-month intervals. During the study, 1,003 patients received antibiotic therapy with at least one of the study drugs; of the 792 receiving cycle antibiotics during the cycling period, 598 (75.5%) received an on-cycle drug. Compared to the baseline, cycling recommendations increased the use of the target cycle agent: the use of cephalosporins increased during cycle 1 (56 to 64% of total antibiotic days, P < 0.001), fluoroquinolone use increased in cycle 2 (24 to 55%, P < 0.001), carbapenem use increased during cycle 3 (14 to 38%, P < 0.001), and use of extended-spectrum penicillins increased in cycle 4 (5 to 36%, P < 0.001). Overall, 48% of total cycle antibiotic days were compliant with the cycling protocol. On average, 8.8 days per patient were spent receiving on-cycle drugs (range, 1 to 109). Cycle periods that specified carbapenem and fluoroquinolone use had the highest number of off-cycle days (62 and 64%). Predictors of on-cycle antibiotic use were increased severity of illness, as measured by an acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, and greater length of intensive care unit stay. In conclusion, the successful implementation of this cycling protocol increased antibiotic heterogeneity over time in the study unit.
机译:已经提出了各种干预措施来对抗抗生素抗性的增加并影响抗生素处方的实践。在重症监护病房中进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以确定抗生素循环方案对抗生素使用方式的影响,并确定与循环依从性相关的患者因素。经验性治疗疑似革兰氏阴性细菌感染的四大类抗生素每隔3个月和4个月轮换一次。在研究期间,共有1,003名患者接受了至少一种研究药物的抗生素治疗;在循环期间的792种接受循环抗生素的药物中,有598种(75.5%)接受了循环使用药物。与基线相比,骑自行车的建议增加了目标循环剂的使用:在第1周期头孢菌素的使用增加(占总抗生素天数的56%至64%,P <0.001),在第2周期中氟喹诺酮的使用增加(24%至55%) ,P <0.001),在第3周期中碳青霉烯的使用增加(14%至38%,P <0.001),在第4周期中,广谱青霉素的使用增加(5%至36%,P <0.001)。总体而言,总循环抗生素天数的48%符合循环方案。平均每个患者花8.8天的时间接受周期内药物治疗(范围1到109)。指定使用碳青霉烯和氟喹诺酮的循环周期的非循环天数最多(分别为62%和64%)。周期使用抗生素的预测因素是疾病的严重程度增加,这是通过急性生理和慢性健康评估II得分来衡量的,并且重症监护病房的住院时间更长。总之,在研究单位中,随着时间的推移,这种循环方案的成功实施增加了抗生素的异质性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号