首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy >Randomized Controlled Trial of Sequential Intravenous (i.v.) and Oral Moxifloxacin Compared with Sequential i.v. and Oral Co-Amoxiclav with or without Clarithromycin in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Requiring Initial Parenteral Treatment
【2h】

Randomized Controlled Trial of Sequential Intravenous (i.v.) and Oral Moxifloxacin Compared with Sequential i.v. and Oral Co-Amoxiclav with or without Clarithromycin in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Requiring Initial Parenteral Treatment

机译:序贯静脉(i.v.)和口服莫西沙星与序贯i.v.的随机对照试验需要初始肠胃外治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者的口服和口服阿莫昔芬联合或不联合克拉霉素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objective of the present trial was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of moxifloxacin (400 mg) given intravenously (i.v.) once daily followed by oral moxifloxacin (400 mg) for 7 to 14 days with the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of co-amoxiclav (1.2 g) administered by i.v. infusion three times a day followed by oral co-amoxiclav (625 mg) three times a day, with or without clarithromycin (500 mg) twice daily (i.v. or orally), for 7 to 14 days in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring initial parenteral therapy. A total of 628 patients were enrolled and assessed by evaluation of their clinical and bacteriological responses 5 to 7 days and 21 to 28 days after administration of the last dose of study medication. Although the trial was designed, on the basis of predefined outcomes, to demonstrate the equivalence of the two regimens, the results showed statistically significant higher clinical success rates (for moxifloxacin, 93.4%, and for comparator regimen, 85.4%; difference [Δ], 8.05%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.91 to 13.19%; P = 0.004) and bacteriological success rates (for moxifloxacin, 93.7%, and for comparator regimen, 81.7%; Δ, 12.06%; 95% CI, 1.21 to 22.91%) for patients treated with moxifloxacin. This superiority was seen irrespective of the severity of the pneumonia and whether or not the combination therapy included a macrolide. The time to resolution of fever was also statistically significantly faster for patients who received moxifloxacin (median time, 2 versus 3 days), and the duration of hospital admission was approximately 1 day less for patients who received moxifloxacin. The treatment was converted to oral therapy immediately after the initial mandatory 3-day period of i.v. administration for a larger proportion of patients in the moxifloxacin group than patients in the comparator group (151 [50.2%] versus 57 [17.8%] patients). There were fewer deaths (9 [3.0%] versus 17 [5.3%]) and fewer serious adverse events (38 [12.6%] versus 53 [16.5%]) in the moxifloxacin group than in the comparator group. The rates of drug-related adverse events were comparable in both groups (38.9% in each treatment group). The overall incidence of laboratory abnormalities was similar in both groups. Thus, it is concluded that monotherapy with moxifloxacin is superior to that with a standard combination regimen of a β-lactam and a β-lactamase inhibitor, co-amoxiclav, with or without a macrolide, clarithromycin, in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to a hospital.
机译:本试验的目的是比较每天静脉注射一次(iv)莫西沙星(400 mg),然后口服口服莫西沙星(400 mg)7至14天的疗效,安全性和耐受性,以比较其有效性,安全性和耐受性。 iv服用的co-amoxiclav(1.2 g)对于社区获得性肺炎需要治疗的成年患者,每天输注3次,然后每天口服3次口服共莫昔夫拉(625 mg),每天两次或不口服克拉霉素(500 mg)(静脉内或口服),共7至14天初始肠胃外治疗。总共628名患者入组,并在给予最后一剂研究药物后5至7天和21至28天通过评估其临床和细菌学反应进行评估。尽管该试验是根据预定义的结果设计的,以证明两种方案的等效性,但结果显示,统计学上较高的临床成功率(莫西沙星为93.4%,对照方案为85.4%;差异[Δ] ,8.05%; 95%置信区间[CI]为2.91至13.19%; P = 0.004)和细菌学成功率(莫西沙星为93.7%,比较方案为81.7%;Δ为12.06%; 95%CI为1.21 (至22.91%)接受莫西沙星治疗的患者。无论肺炎的严重程度如何,以及联合疗法是否包括大环内酯类药物,都可以看到这种优势。接受莫西沙星治疗的患者的发烧时间在统计学上也明显更快(中位时间为2天比3天),而接受莫西沙星治疗的患者住院时间减少了约1天。静脉注射最初的强制性3天后,治疗立即转换为口服治疗。莫西沙星组的患者比例要比对照组的患者大(151 [50.2%]比57 [17.8%]个患者)。与对照组相比,莫西沙星组的死亡人数更少(9 [3.0%]比17 [5.3%])和严重不良事件(38 [12.6%]比53 [16.5%])更少。两组的药物相关不良事件发生率相当(每个治疗组为38.9%)。两组实验室异常的总发生率相似。因此,可以得出结论,莫西沙星的单药治疗在伴有或未伴有大环内酯类药物克拉霉素的情况下,优于使用β-内酰胺和β-内酰胺酶抑制剂co-amoxiclav的标准联合治疗方案。获得性肺炎入院。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号