首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy >Comparison of in vitro antibiograms of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates: differences in resistance rates in two institutions because of differences in susceptibility testing methodology.
【2h】

Comparison of in vitro antibiograms of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates: differences in resistance rates in two institutions because of differences in susceptibility testing methodology.

机译:脆弱拟杆菌(Bacteroides fragilis)组分离株的体外抗菌谱比较:由于敏感性测试方法的差异两个机构的耐药率存在差异。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With 120 clinical isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group, a comparison of rates of resistance to selected antimicrobial agents by using two susceptibility tests was performed in two medical institutions. The broth microdilution method produced MICs significantly lower than those determined by the agar dilution method. With ceftizoxime and cefoxitin, 88 and 18%, respectively, of the MICs were greater than or equal to 2 twofold dilutions apart. These differences in MIC results produced major interpretive discrepancies for ceftizoxime and cefoxitin, whereas no significant differences in resistance rates were noted for clindamycin and metronidazole.
机译:在两个医疗机构中,通过对120株脆弱拟杆菌的临床分离株进行比较,通过两次药敏试验比较了对所选抗菌剂的耐药率。肉汤微稀释法产生的MIC显着低于琼脂稀释法测定的MIC。使用头孢唑肟和头孢西丁时,分别有88%和18%的MIC分别大于或等于2倍稀释倍数。 MIC结果的这些差异产生了头孢唑肟和头孢西丁的主要解释差异,而对克林霉素和甲硝唑的耐药率没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号