首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Applied and Environmental Microbiology >Application of Neural Computing Methods for Interpreting Phospholipid Fatty Acid Profiles of Natural Microbial Communities
【2h】

Application of Neural Computing Methods for Interpreting Phospholipid Fatty Acid Profiles of Natural Microbial Communities

机译:神经计算方法在解释天然微生物群落磷脂脂肪酸谱中的应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The microbial community compositions of surface and subsurface marine sediments and sediments lining burrows of marine polychaetes and hemichordates from the North Inlet estuary (near Georgetown, S.C.) were analyzed by comparing ester-linked phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) profiles with a back-propagating neural network (NN). The NNs were trained to relate PLFA inputs to sediment type outputs (e.g., surface, subsurface, and burrow lining) and worm species (e.g., Notomastus lobatus, Balanoglossus aurantiacus, and Branchyoasychus americana). Sensitivity analysis was used to determine which of the 60 PLFAs significantly contributed to training the NN. The NN architecture was optimized by changing the number of hidden neurons and calculating the cross-validation error between predicted and actual outputs of training and test data. The optimal NN architecture was found to be four hidden neurons with 60-input neurons representing the 60 PLFAs, and four output neurons coding for both sediment types and worm species. Comparison of cross-validation results using NNs and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) revealed that NNs had significantly fewer incorrect classifications (2.7%) than LDA (8.4%). For the NN cross-validation, both sediment type and worm species had 3 incorrect classifications out of 112. For the LDA cross-validation, sediment type and worm species had 7 and 12 incorrect classifications out of 112, respectively. Sensitivity analysis of the trained NNs revealed that 17 fatty acids explained 50% of variability in the data set. These PLFAs were highly different among sediments and burrow types, indicating significant differences in the microbiota.
机译:通过比较酯连接的磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)分布图和反向传播的神经网络,分析了北入口河口(南卡罗来纳州乔治敦附近)的海表和海表沉积物和海藻的表层和地下海底微生物沉积物和衬里洞穴的微生物群落组成。网络(NN)。 NN被训练为将PLFA输入与沉积物类型输出(例如,地表,地下和洞穴衬里)和蠕虫种类(例如,Notomastus lobatus,Balanoglossus aurantiacus和American Branchyoasychus americana)相关联。敏感性分析用于确定60个PLFA中的哪些对神经网络的训练有显着贡献。通过更改隐藏神经元的数量并计算训练和测试数据的预测输出与实际输出之间的交叉验证误差来优化NN体系结构。发现最佳的NN结构是四个隐藏的神经元,其中60个输入神经元代表60个PLFA,四个输出神经元编码沉积物类型和蠕虫种类。使用NN和线性判别分析(LDA)进行交叉验证的结果比较表明,NNs的错误分类(2.7%)明显少于LDA(8.4%)。对于NN交叉验证,沉积物类型和蠕虫种类在112种中有3个错误分类。对于LDA交叉验证,沉积物类型和蠕虫种类在112种中分别有7个和12种错误分类。对经过训练的神经网络的敏感性分析表明,17种脂肪酸解释了数据集中50%的变异性。这些PLFA在沉积物和洞穴类型之间有很大差异,表明微生物群存在显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号