首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Applied and Environmental Microbiology >Comparison of Clarks presence-absence test and the membrane filter method for coliform detection in potable water samples.
【2h】

Comparison of Clarks presence-absence test and the membrane filter method for coliform detection in potable water samples.

机译:饮用水中大肠菌群检测的Clarks不存在测试和膜过滤器方法的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A total of 2,601 water samples from six different water systems were tested for coliform bacteria by Clark's presence-absence (P-A) test and by the membrane filter (MF) method. There was no significant difference in the fraction of samples positive for coliform bacteria for any of the systems tested. It was concluded that the two tests are equivalent for monitoring purposes. However, 152 samples were positive for coliform bacteria by the MF method but negative by the P-A test, and 132 samples were positive by the P-A test but negative by the MF method. Many of these differences for individual samples can be explained by random dispersion of bacteria in subsamples when the coliform density is low. However, 15 samples had MF counts greater than 3 and gave negative P-A results. The only apparent explanation for most of these results is that coliform bacteria were present in the P-A test bottles but did not produce acid and gas. Two other studies have reported more samples positive by Clark's P-A test than by the MF method.
机译:通过Clark's不存在(P-A)测试和膜过滤器(MF)方法对来自六个不同水系统的总共2,601个水样品进行了大肠菌检测。对于任何测试的系统,大肠菌群呈阳性的样品比例均无显着差异。结论是,这两个测试在监视目的上是等效的。但是,通过MF方法,有152个样品对大肠菌群呈阳性,但通过P-A测试呈阴性,而通过P-A测试,有132个样品呈阳性,但通过MF方法呈阴性。大肠菌群密度低时,细菌在子样本中的随机分散可以解释单个样本的许多差异。但是,有15个样品的MF计数大于3,并且P-A结果为负。大多数结果的唯一显而易见的解释是,大肠菌存在于P-A测试瓶中,但不会产生酸和气体。另外两项研究报告说,通过Clark的P-A测试得到的阳性样本比通过MF方法得到的样本多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号