首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research >Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:比较两种干式针刺治疗足底跟痛的方法:一项随机对照试验的方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundBoth manual therapy techniques and dry needling have shown to be effective treatment options for the treatment of plantar heel pain; however, in recent years, other techniques based on dry needling (DN), such as percutaneous needle electrolysis (PNE), have also emerged. Currently, PNE is being used in clinical practice to manage myofascial trigger points, despite the lack of studies comparing the effects of this technique over dry needling. Therefore, the aim of this randomized controlled study is to compare the effectiveness of DN versus PNE for improving the level of pain experienced by patients suffering from plantar heel pain provoked by myofascial trigger points.
机译:背景技术手动治疗技术和干式针刺已被证明是治疗足跟痛的有效选择。但是,近年来,还出现了基于干针刺(DN)的其他技术,例如经皮针电解(PNE)。目前,尽管缺乏将这种技术对干针刺效果进行比较的研究,但PNE在临床实践中仍被用于管理肌筋膜触发点。因此,这项随机对照研究的目的是比较DN和PNE在改善肌筋膜触发点引起的足跟痛患者的疼痛水平方面的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号