首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Asian Journal of Andrology >Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone therapy is associated with earlier spermatogenesis compared to combined gonadotropin therapy in patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism
【2h】

Pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone therapy is associated with earlier spermatogenesis compared to combined gonadotropin therapy in patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

机译:与先天性促性腺激素减低性腺功能减退的患者相比与促性腺激素联合治疗相比脉冲性促性腺激素释放激素治疗与较早生精有关

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Both pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) infusion and combined gonadotropin therapy (human chorionic gonadotropin and human menopausal gonadotropin [HCG/HMG]) are effective to induce spermatogenesis in male patients with congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH). However, evidence is lacking as to which treatment strategy is better. This retrospective cohort study included 202 patients with CHH: twenty had received pulsatile GnRH and 182 had received HCG/HMG. Patients had received therapy for at least 12 months. The total follow-up time was 15.6 ± 5.0 months (range: 12–27 months) for the GnRH group and 28.7 ± 13.0 months (range: 12–66 months) for the HCG/HMG group. The median time to first sperm appearance was 6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6–10.4) in the GnRH group versus 18 months (95% CI: 16.4–20.0) in the HCG/HMG group (P < 0.001). The median time to achieve sperm concentrations ≥5 × 106 ml−1 was 14 months (95% CI: 5.8–22.2) in the GnRH group versus 27 months (95% CI: 18.9–35.1) in the HCG/HMG group (P < 0.001), and the median time to concentrations ≥10 × 106 ml−1 was 18 months (95% CI: 10.0–26.0) in the GnRH group versus 39 months (95% CI unknown) in the HCG/HMG group. Compared to the GnRH group, the HCG/HMG group required longer treatment periods to achieve testicular sizes of ≥4 ml, ≥8 ml, ≥12 ml, and ≥16 ml. Sperm motility (a + b + c percentage) evaluated in semen samples with concentrations >1 × 106 ml−1 was 43.7% ± 20.4% (16 samples) in the GnRH group versus 43.2% ± 18.1% (153 samples) in the HCG/HMG group (P = 0.921). Notably, during follow-up, the GnRH group had lower serum testosterone levels than the HCG/HMG group (8.3 ± 4.6 vs 16.2 ± 8.2 nmol l−1, P < 0.001). Our study found that pulsatile GnRH therapy was associated with earlier spermatogenesis and larger testicular size compared to combined gonadotropin therapy. Additional prospective randomized studies would be required to confirm these findings.
机译:脉冲性促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)输注和促性腺激素联合疗法(人绒毛膜促性腺激素和人更年期促性腺激素[HCG / HMG])均可有效诱导男性先天性促性腺激素性性腺功能减退症(CHH)的精子发生。但是,缺乏哪种治疗策略更好的证据。这项回顾性队列研究包括202名CHH患者:20名接受了搏动性GnRH,182名接受了HCG / HMG。患者接受了至少12个月的治疗。 GnRH组的总随访时间为15.6±5.0个月(范围:12–27个月),HCG / HMG组的总随访时间为28.7±13.0个月(范围:12–66个月)。 GnRH组中首次出现精子的中位时间为6个月(95%置信区间[CI]:1.6–10.4),而HCG / HMG组中为18个月(95%CI:16.4–20.0)(P <0.001) 。 GnRH组中达到精子浓度≥5×10 6 ml -1 的中位时间为14个月(95%CI:5.8–22.2),而27个月(95) HCG / HMG组的CI百分比:18.9–35.1(P <0.001),浓度≥10×10 6 ml -1 的中位时间为18个月GnRH组(95%CI:10.0-26.0),而HCG / HMG组为39个月(95%CI未知)。与GnRH组相比,HCG / HMG组需要更长的治疗时间才能达到睾丸尺寸≥4ml,≥8ml,≥12ml和≥16ml。精液中浓度> 1×10 6 ml -1 的精子活力(a + b + c百分比)为43.7%±20.4%(16个样品)。 GnRH组与HCG / HMG组的43.2%±18.1%(153个样品)相比(P = 0.921)。值得注意的是,在随访期间,GnRH组的血清睾丸激素水平低于HCG / HMG组(8.3±4.6对16.2±8.2 nmol l -1 ,P <0.001)。我们的研究发现,与促性腺激素联合治疗相比,搏动性GnRH治疗与早期生精和更大的睾丸大小有关。需要其他前瞻性随机研究来证实这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号