首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences >Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements
【2h】

Estimation of Sensory Pork Loin Tenderness Using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force and Texture Profile Analysis Measurements

机译:使用Warner-Bratzler剪切力和纹理轮廓分析测量值来估算感官猪的腰肉嫩度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigated the degree to which instrumental measurements explain the variation in pork loin tenderness as assessed by the sensory evaluation of trained panelists. Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) had a significant relationship with the sensory tenderness variables, such as softness, initial tenderness, chewiness, and rate of breakdown. In a regression analysis, WBS could account variations in these sensory variables, though only to a limited proportion of variation. On the other hand, three parameters from texture profile analysis (TPA)—hardness, gumminess, and chewiness—were significantly correlated with all sensory evaluation variables. In particular, from the result of stepwise regression analysis, TPA hardness alone explained over 15% of variation in all sensory evaluation variables, with the exception of perceptible residue. Based on these results, TPA analysis was found to be better than WBS measurement, with the TPA parameter hardness likely to prove particularly useful, in terms of predicting pork loin tenderness as rated by trained panelists. However, sensory evaluation should be conducted to investigate practical pork tenderness perceived by consumer, because both instrumental measurements could explain only a small portion (less than 20%) of the variability in sensory evaluation.
机译:这项研究调查了仪器测量解释受训练的小组成员的感官评估所评估的猪里脊肉嫩度变化的程度。 Warner-Bratzler剪切力(WBS)与感觉柔软度变量(如柔软度,初始柔软度,耐嚼性和分解率)有显着关系。在回归分析中,WBS可以解释这些感官变量的变化,尽管仅是有限比例的变化。另一方面,来自质地轮廓分析(TPA)的三个参数-硬度,胶质和耐嚼性-与所有感官评估变量都显着相关。特别是,从逐步回归分析的结果来看,TPA硬度单独解释了所有感官评估变量中超过15%的变化(可感知残留物除外)。根据这些结果,发现TPA分析优于WBS测量,TPA参数硬度可能被证明特别有用,在预测受过训练的小组成员对猪里脊肉的柔软度方面。但是,应该进行感官评估,以调查消费者感知到的实际猪肉嫩度,因为两种仪器测量方法只能解释一小部分(少于20%)的感官评估变异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号