首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences >Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures Traditions and Religious Faiths
【2h】

Animal Welfare in Different Human Cultures Traditions and Religious Faiths

机译:不同人类文化传统和宗教信仰下的动物福利

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Animal welfare has become a growing concern affecting acceptability of agricultural systems in many countries around the world. An earlier Judeo-Christian interpretation of the Bible (1982) that dominion over animals meant that any degree of exploitation was acceptable has changed for most people to mean that each person has responsibility for animal welfare. This view was evident in some ancient Greek writings and has parallels in Islamic teaching. A minority view of Christians, which is a widespread view of Jains, Buddhists and many Hindus, is that animals should not be used by humans as food or for other purposes. The commonest philosophical positions now, concerning how animals should be treated, are a blend of deontological and utilitarian approaches. Most people think that extremes of poor welfare in animals are unacceptable and that those who keep animals should strive for good welfare. Hence animal welfare science, which allows the evaluation of welfare, has developed rapidly.
机译:动物福利已成为影响世界上许多国家农业系统可接受性的一个日益关注的问题。犹太人和基督教徒对圣经(1982)的较早解释是,对动物的支配意味着任何程度的剥削都是可以接受的,对于大多数人来说,这已经改变,意味着每个人都对动物的福祉负有责任。这种观点在一些古希腊著作中很明显,并且在伊斯兰教义上也有类似之处。基督教徒的少数派观点是Ja那教,佛教徒和许多印度教徒的普遍观点是,动物不应被人类用作食物或其他用途。关于动物应如何对待的最普遍的哲学立场是义务论和功利主义方法的融合。大多数人认为极端恶劣的动物福利是不可接受的,饲养动物的人应争取良好的福利。因此,允许评估福利的动物福利科学发展迅速。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号